Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Originally posted by KarishmaB on 10 Sep 2013, 20:50.
Last edited by KarishmaB on 28 Nov 2023, 00:19, edited 1 time in total.
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is a post on solving third degree equations:
How do you solve an equation such as \(x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6 = 0\)? How do we get the values of x which satisfy this equation?
If you do get a third degree equation, it will have one very easy root such as 0 or 1 or -1 or 2 or -2 etc. Try a few of these values to get the first root. Here x = 1 works. It is easy to see since you have two 6s, a 1 and an 11 as the coefficients. Putting x = 1: \((1)^3 - 6(1)^2 + 11(1) - 6 = 0\) So you know that (x – 1) is a factor. Now figure out the quadratic which when multiplied by (x – 1) gives the third degree expression
\((x - 1)(ax^2 + bx + c) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6\) How do we figure out the values of a, b and c? Let’s see. Coefficient of x^3 on right hand side is 1. So you know that all you need is x^2 so that it multiplies with x to give x^3 on left hand side too. So ‘a’ must be 1.
\((x - 1)(x^2 + bx + c) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6\) The constant term, ‘c’, is easy to figure out too. It should multiply with -1 to give -6 on right hand side. Hence c must be 6.
\((x - 1)(x^2 + bx + 6) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6\) Getting the middle term is slightly more complicated. bx multiplies with x to give x^2 term and you also get the x^2 term by multiplying -1 with x^2. You have -6x^2 on right hand side so you need the same on the left hand side too. You already have -x^2 (by multiplying -1 with x^2) so you need another -5x^2 from bx^2. So b must be -5.
\((x - 1)(x^2 - 5x + 6) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 11x - 6\) Now you just factorize the quadratic in the usual way. Let’s see how exactly we would do it using a question.
Question: Is \(x^3 + 2x^2 - 5x - 6 < 0\) Statement 1: -3 < x <= -1 Statement 2: -1 <= x < 2
Solution: We know how to deal with inequalities with multiple factors ( discussed here https://youtu.be/PWsUOe77__E ). But the inequality is not split into factors here so we will have to do it on our own. Let’s first try to find the simple root that this expression must have. Try x = 1, -1 etc. We see that when we put x = -1, the expression becomes 0. \(x^3 + 2x^2 - 5x - 6 = (-1)^3 + 2(-1)^2 - 5(-1) - 6 = 0\) So the first factor we get is (x + 1).
\((x + 1)(ax^2 + bx + c) = x^3 + 2x^2 - 5x - 6\) a must be 1 since we have \(x^3\) on the right hand side. c must be -6 since we have -6 on the right hand side.
\((x + 1)(x^2 + bx - 6) = x^3 + 2x^2 - 5x - 6\) \(bx^2 + x^2 = 2x^2\) So b must be 1.
We get: \((x + 1)(x^2 + x - 6)\) which is equal to \((x + 1)(x + 3)(x - 2)\) (after splitting the quadratic) So the question becomes: Is \((x + 1)(x + 3)(x - 2) < 0?\) We already know how to deal with inequalities with multiple factors. The transition points here will be -3, -1 and 2. The expression will be negative in the ranges -1 < x < 2 and x < -3
Statement 1: -3 < x <= -1 In this region, the expression is positive (when -3 < x < -1) or 0 (when x = -1). Hence it will certainly not be negative. This is sufficient to answer the question with ‘No’. Hence statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question.
Statement 2: -1 <= x < 2 In this region, the expression is negative (when -1 < x < 2) or 0 (when x = -1). We cannot say for certain whether it will be negative or not. Hence statement 2 alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Answer (A) It’s not hard to deal with third degree equations. All you have to do is bring it down to second degree by figuring out one root and then the problem is in a format you already know.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Is it possible to use plug-in approach to quickly solve similar questions? Statement 1: -3 < x <= -1 Plug-in: -3,-2,-1 Statement 2: -1 <= x < 2 Plug-in: -1,0,1,2
I understand the range is important in such questions, but then ain't there methods to plug-in and reverse solve?
Is it possible to use plug-in approach to quickly solve similar questions? Statement 1: -3 < x <= -1 Plug-in: -3,-2,-1 Statement 2: -1 <= x < 2 Plug-in: -1,0,1,2
I understand the range is important in such questions, but then ain't there methods to plug-in and reverse solve?
Show more
Sure you can but there will be risk since you certainly cannot plug in all values to check.
e.g. Imagine that you have a third degree expression which factors out as: Is (x + 1)(x + 2)(x - 3) <= 0?
Say, given range is -2 < x < 3 You try -1, 0, 1, 2 All of them satisfy the inequality. Does it mean that in this range, (x + 1)(x + 2)(x - 3) is negative or 0? Does it mean that this statement alone is sufficient? No. because in -2 < x< -1, (x + 1)(x + 2)(x - 3) is positive. While in -1 < x < 3, the expression is negative.
So I like to use plug in only when I don't see any other easy way out.
As for questions which use plug in to reverse solve, the higher level questions nowadays do not allow that luxury. They are made keeping in mind that you know how to plug in. Only the lower level questions might be solvable as such.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.