Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 22:31 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 22:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
pb_india
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Last visit: 27 May 2005
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Posts: 173
Kudos: 1,378
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Antmavel
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 581
Own Kudos:
Location: London, UK
Schools:Tuck'08
Posts: 581
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 533
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MA
Antmavel
a good one, i am not so sure, I would answer A
in statement 1 we know that Z is a positive integer so there is no way Z=-3, the only solution is that Z is equal to any positive number but that X=0 so XZ=0 -> suff. in statement 2, Z could be for example 3 and X could also be 3. Not suff

If Z is a positive integer, x*z=0?
1) x*z=-3x
2) x*z=3x

Answer should be A, but this is one of the poorly worded question because it is not possible to have x*z=-3x = 3x without combining i and ii. to satisfy booth statement x must be o and ETS doesnot ask such question. only after combining both, we know that x = o. therefore no wonder if OA is C.


I'm not so sure it's a bad question. Certainly it's confusing. But if * is a special function, then we don't know anything about the relationship of x and z. Maybe from one we could learn that * means "lose z and multiply by negative 3".

Either way, with C we see that 3x = -3x, and only zero could make that work.
User avatar
banerjeea_98
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Last visit: 17 May 2012
Posts: 674
Own Kudos:
Posts: 674
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"A"

I don't see any ambiguity in this ques, perhaps I am missing something

state 1....x*z + 3x = 0

x(z+3) = 0........so solutions are x = 0 or z = -3 or x = 0 and
z = -3..but Z > 0....so only X can be 0.....so X*Z = 0

state 2....x*z - 3x = 0

x(z-3) = 0......X = 0 or Z= 3 or X=0 and Z = 3.....insuff
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 533
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banerjeea_98
"A". I don't see any ambiguity in this ques, perhaps I am missing something


in isolation, that is ok. but if you see the question in totality, seems something wired.
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If z is positive, the only way x*z can be 0 is for x to be 0. So the question is really asking Is x 0?

(1) x*z = -3x --> tells us x = -x since z is positive. So x must be 0. Sufficient.
(2) z=3. Doesn't really tells us anything. x can be 0 and x*z = 3x. Or x can be any value and still satisfy statement 2.

Ans: A
User avatar
yb
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Last visit: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 390
Own Kudos:
Posts: 390
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ywilfred
If z is positive, the only way x*z can be 0 is for x to be 0. So the question is really asking Is x 0?

(1) x*z = -3x --> tells us x = -x since z is positive. So x must be 0. Sufficient.
(2) z=3. Doesn't really tells us anything. x can be 0 and x*z = 3x. Or x can be any value and still satisfy statement 2.

Ans: A


Agreed... good explanation



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!