Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
This is a question from Manhattan Book, and I am confused with one particular step in solving this problem:
If 4/x < -(1/3), what is the possible range of values for x?
We don't know if x is positive or negative, so we have to assume both scenarios.
x can't be positive though, since it will give us: 4 < -(x/3), which is not possible.
When x is negative, we go through the following steps:
1. Multiply both sides by 3, we will get: 12/x < -1
2. We have to multiply both sides by x to get rid of denominator. Here is the confusing part, since in this scenario x is negative, do we have to flip the inequality sign after the multiplication? The Rule says that we have to flip the sign when we multiply/divide both sides by a negative number, and since in this scenario x is a negative number, we have to get following inequality:
12 > x
So the range of x will be (-infinity ; 0) and (12 ; +infinity)
But, the in the Manhattan book, during step 2, they don't flip the sign when they multiply both sides by x, when assuming that x is negative. Why? is this some kind of exception?
They got the answer with explanation that I have attached to this post.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Attachments
Screen Shot 2017-10-17 at 12.27.30 PM.png [ 226.07 KiB | Viewed 2814 times ]
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.