Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 22:23 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 22:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,790
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bewakoof
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Own Kudos:
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Kudos: 182
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bewakoof
ywilfred
(7^345 + 7^12 - 2)/7 = 7^345 + 7^12/7 - 2/7

7^345 + 7^12/7 will result in a whole number

x.000000 - 2/7 --> Remainder will be approximately 1-2/7 =0.714

I think I am gonna quote you again.. It will be 5.. think about it this way..

the first two are divisible by 7.. so remainder is gonna be 0 for themm.. right?? Now.. its like (49 +14 -2)/7 or (49 + 49 -2)/7.. No matter what remainder will always be 5..
ps: I checked it with scientific calc


I thought of it this way:

The first two are always whole numbers, I think we're on the same page on that. So it will be like:

X.00000 - 2/7 (where X is the whole number and the sting of decimal digits behind). Since 2/7 wil not have a whole number in front, to subtract we need to carry '1' from X and the string of digits at the end will look like 1-2/7 = 0.71..... which was how I got my answer.
User avatar
bewakoof
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Own Kudos:
Location: NYC
Posts: 365
Kudos: 182
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ywilfred


I thought of it this way:

The first two are always whole numbers, I think we're on the same page on that. So it will be like:

X.00000 - 2/7 (where X is the whole number and the sting of decimal digits behind). Since 2/7 wil not have a whole number in front, to subtract we need to carry '1' from X and the string of digits at the end will look like 1-2/7 = 0.71..... which was how I got my answer.


remainder can't be 0.71.. Remainder will always be an Integer.. I hope we both agree on that.. the bolded portion does not hold true.. i think.. you can't carry over 1..like that..
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bewakoof
ywilfred


I thought of it this way:

The first two are always whole numbers, I think we're on the same page on that. So it will be like:

X.00000 - 2/7 (where X is the whole number and the sting of decimal digits behind). Since 2/7 wil not have a whole number in front, to subtract we need to carry '1' from X and the string of digits at the end will look like 1-2/7 = 0.71..... which was how I got my answer.

remainder can't be 0.71.. Remainder will always be an Integer.. I hope we both agree on that.. the bolded portion does not hold true.. i think.. you can't carry over 1..like that..


Didn't read the remainder part. But 'carry' over of 1 is legal. Say 4.0 - 0.3, we need to carry '1' from the '4' to the '0' so we have 3.(1)0 - 0.3 = 3.7. The last digit '7' is akin to having 1-0.3 = 0.7. But I agree my answer is valid only if it's not asking for a remainder.
User avatar
allabout
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Last visit: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
Location: Germany
Posts: 232
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree with 5

I broke the stem down to

7^1 + 7^3 -2, which results in the same lasts digits ( the pattern goes 7,49,xx3, xxx1,xxx7)

7^3, has no remainder

7^1 - 2 leaves 5

I think this method is fast and secure



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!