Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
In yesterday’s post, we discussed the basic properties of Prime Numbers and a couple of methods to identify them. To view the post, please click on this link:
But, both these methods had their own limitations in being able to help us in identifying a prime number.
We had mentioned in our post yesterday that we will be discussing a foolproof approach to identifying Prime numbers. Therefore, today, let’s look at a method that can be applied on any number to ascertain whether it is prime or not.
Let’s suppose we are trying to ascertain if a number X is prime or not. Using a very simple algorithm, involving a few simple steps, you will be able to find out if X is prime. So, what’s this algorithm? We have listed it out in a step by step manner so that it becomes easy for you to perform the calculations:
First – Find out the nearest perfect square to X, lesser than X.
Second – Calculate the square root of this perfect square that you just found out in the previous step.
Third – List out all prime numbers which are lesser or equal to the square root you calculated in the second step.
Fourth – Check whether the given number X is divisible by any of the prime numbers listed down by you in the third step.
Fifth – If it is divisible by even ONE of the prime numbers, then it means X has more than 2 factors (remember the fact that any positive integer will definitely have 2 factors – 1 and itself) and hence is NOT prime. On the other hand, if X is not divisible by any of the prime numbers listed down by you, then X is a prime.
This method can be applied to any number and does not have exceptions like the previous two methods. The only pre-requisites, for you to apply this method effectively, are that you need to know basic divisibility rules and at least the first 15 prime numbers by heart.
Having said that, this is not to say that the methods discussed in our previous post, are totally ineffective. In a lot of questions where you need to identify prime numbers, we would still recommend you to start off by using the (6k) - 1 and the (6k) + 1 concept, to eliminate at least 1 or 2 options. Post this, you can use the method that we described today to zero in on the Prime number, of the remaining options.
In the third part of this post, tomorrow, we will look at a few important application areas of Prime numbers so that you get a hang of how to apply the concepts that we have discussed till now.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Having said that, this is not to say that the methods discussed in our previous post, are totally ineffective. In a lot of questions where you need to identify prime numbers, we would still recommend you to start off by using the (6k) - 1 and the (6k) + 1 concept, to eliminate at least 1 or 2 options. Post this, you can use the method that we described today to zero in on the Prime number, of the remaining options.
Show more
Checking if a number is in the form 6k-1 or 6k+1 amounts to checking that the number is divisible neither by 2 nor by 3, which you can do almost instantly using divisibility tests.
ArvindCrackVerbal
This method can be applied to any number and does not have exceptions like the previous two methods. The only pre-requisites, for you to apply this method effectively, are that you need to know basic divisibility rules and at least the first 15 prime numbers by heart.
Show more
In case this might mislead test takers about what the GMAT might ask them to do: you would never need to use all of the first fifteen primes in a prime-testing situation on the GMAT. That is, you will never see a number roughly equal to 47^2 and need to prove that it's prime, because that would take far too long. It cannot be true in a GMAT question that you need to figure out that, say, 2213 is prime, because the fastest way to prove that is by using the method Arvind describes, and that method involves checking if 2213 is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 (after first working out that 47^2 is the nearest perfect square just less than 2213). Almost no one can do that in two minutes. If there were a number roughly that big in a GMAT question, say 2107 or 2199, and for some reason it was important to decide whether the number was prime, the answer will simply always be "it is not prime", because they could never ask you in two minutes to prove that it is. The number will have some obvious divisor: 2107 is divisible by 7 (because 2107 = 2100 + 7 = 7(301)), for example, or 2199 is divisible by 3 (which we can see immediately by summing its digits).
ArvindCrackVerbal wrote: Having said that, this is not to say that the methods discussed in our previous post, are totally ineffective. In a lot of questions where you need to identify prime numbers, we would still recommend you to start off by using the (6k) - 1 and the (6k) + 1 concept, to eliminate at least 1 or 2 options. Post this, you can use the method that we described today to zero in on the Prime number, of the remaining options.
Show more
Quote:
Checking if a number is in the form 6k-1 or 6k+1 amounts to checking that the number is divisible neither by 2 nor by 3, which you can do almost instantly using divisibility tests.
Show more
That's right Ian. This was one of the things we had planned to bring up in our post today in the problem solving part. Thanks for your point.
Quote:
ArvindCrackVerbal wrote: This method can be applied to any number and does not have exceptions like the previous two methods. The only pre-requisites, for you to apply this method effectively, are that you need to know basic divisibility rules and at least the first 15 prime numbers by heart.
Show more
Quote:
In case this might mislead test takers about what the GMAT might ask them to do: you would never need to use all of the first fifteen primes in a prime-testing situation on the GMAT. That is, you will never see a number roughly equal to 47^2 and need to prove that it's prime, because that would take far too long. It cannot be true in a GMAT question that you need to figure out that, say, 2213 is prime, because the fastest way to prove that is by using the method Arvind describes, and that method involves checking if 2213 is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 (after first working out that 47^2 is the nearest perfect square just less than 2213). Almost no one can do that in two minutes. If there were a number roughly that big in a GMAT question, say 2107 or 2199, and for some reason it was important to decide whether the number was prime, the answer will simply always be "it is not prime", because they could never ask you in two minutes to prove that it is. The number will have some obvious divisor: 2107 is divisible by 7 (because 2107 = 2100 + 7 = 7(301)), for example, or 2199 is divisible by 3 (which we can see immediately by summing its digits).
Show more
Valid point, Ian. I agree with the fact that GMAT is not a test on Math alone. The idea behind suggesting to remember the prime numbers is to convey that it can be a good addition to, a sort of "Good to know" list. Your reply has added a lot of value to this discussion, though. Thank you.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.