JKruger
A town library allows membership to only the residents of that town. At a certain point in time all the books are
lent out. No two people have borrowed exactly the same number of books. 238 people haven’t borrowed anything
and the total number of books in the library was 105.
(i) What is the maximum number of people in the town?
(ii) What is the minimum number of people in the town?
Please help.
Hello,
JKruger. This is not a homework problem, is it? I ask because this is definitely NOT a GMAT™-like question. DS statements offer information that may prove sufficient to answer the question asked. You have simply presented an open-ended problem with two completely different questions. Also, I doubt the GMAT™ would use different terms—
residents and
people—to refer to the same group. If we allow for the two terms to be used interchangeably in the question, then we can proceed as follows.
Quote:
(i) What is the maximum number of people in the town?
The key to answering this one lies in the third line of the problem:
No two people have borrowed exactly the same number of books. If all 105 books were lent out, then we just have to figure out the largest number of unique positive integers that can sum to 105.
1 +
2 +
3 +
4 + 5 +
6 +
7 +
8 +
9 = 45
Note that by pairing certain numbers, we keep getting sums of 10, and we are already up to 45. This idea looks promising. What if we kept going? If we examine the integer 105 itself, we can see that it factors into 3 * 5 * 7. The smallest multiple of two factors is 15, so perhaps this should be our desired sum of paired numbers rather than 10.
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 = 105
There we go. At a maximum, then, we could have 14 people who borrowed the 105 books
in addition to the 238 people who had not borrowed anything but were eligible to do so. This gives us a sum of
252 residents.
Quote:
(ii) What is the minimum number of people in the town?
Since we are not given any information about borrowing limits, there could be one resident who decided to check out all the books, in which case the answer would be 238 + 1, or 239 residents. Of course, since this one person had borrowed all the material, there would be nothing else for the library to lend out, and we could accurately say that, to quote the problem again,
no two people have borrowed exactly the same number of books (i.e. 238 residents borrowed none, 1 resident borrowed all). If the question-writer means for us to interpret the third line as saying that
at least two people borrowed books, then, since 105 is not evenly divisible by 2, there would be no way for two residents to have borrowed the same number of books. In this scenario, there would be 238 + 2, or 240 residents.
I am less satisfied with the second question than the first. I think the first could made into a decent GMAT™-like question. The second one is too open-ended. If this is all a big trap question, and
people can refer to non-residents, then, well, what a waste of time.
- Andrew