Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 13:15 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 13:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ritula
Joined: 18 May 2008
Last visit: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Posts: 694
Kudos: 3,210
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Oski
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools:INSEAD Class of July '10
Posts: 113
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pmenon
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 691
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 691
Kudos: 620
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Oski
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools:INSEAD Class of July '10
Posts: 113
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It IS a method.

As I said, either the all work, or none of them do.

And "none" is not a choice ;)
User avatar
Oski
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools:INSEAD Class of July '10
Posts: 113
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If you want a proof per se (but you don't need it in GMAT):

First, you know (or can verify easily) that (the reminder of a*b by 3) is the reminder of (the reminder of a by 3)*(the reminder of b by 3) by 3

\(2^{201} = 2*(2^2)^{100}\)

The reminder of \(2^2\) by 3 being 1, we can say that the reminder of \((2^2)^{100}\) by 3 is 1 as well (since \(1^{100}=1\))

Therefore the reminder of \(2^{201}\) by 3 is 2.

If you substract 2, 5 or 8 to that number, you will find 0, -3 or -6, whom reminder by 3 are all 0.
User avatar
scthakur
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I tried a lengthier option here.

2^1 = 2
2^2 = 4
2^3 = 8
2^4 = 16
2^5 = 32
2^6 = 64
2^7 = 128
2^8 = 256
2^9 = 512
and so on.

Thus, we see that the units digit repeats for every fifth power. i.e. 2^201 should have the unit digit as 2.

Now, any number above having unit digit as 2 can be divisible by 3 if you subtract either 2 or 5 or 8 from it (i.e. sum of digits is divisible by 3). Going by this analogy, 2^201 - n will be divisible by 3 for all three values of n.
User avatar
Oski
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools:INSEAD Class of July '10
Posts: 113
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scthakur
Thus, we see that the units digit repeats for every fifth power. i.e. 2^201 should have the unit digit as 2.
I see that the unit digit repeats every 4 powers, doesn't it ? You have a 2 at the end of 2^1, 2^5, 2^9,...

Still: unit digit of 2^201 should be 2 (since 201 = 4*50 + 1)

But:
scthakur
Now, any number above having unit digit as 2 can be divisible by 3 if you subtract either 2 or 5 or 8 from it (i.e. sum of digits is divisible by 3)
I don't see how knowing just the digit unit can give you any information on the sum of digits.

And no, "any number having unit digit as 2 can be divisible by 3 if you subtract either 2 or 5 or 8 from it" is not true.

Try 12 for instance.
User avatar
scthakur
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
453
 [1]
Posts: 608
Kudos: 453
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Oski,

In the series of 2^n, the possible numbers with 2 as unit digit are 2, 32, 512, etc.

Now for number 2, 2-2 = 0, divisible by 3. 2-5 = -3 -> divisible by 3. 2-8 = -6 -> divisible by 3.

Similarly, 32-2 = 30 -> divisible by 3, 32-5 = 27 -> divisible by 3, 32-8 = 24 -> divisible by 3.

Similarly, 512-2 = 510 -> divisible by 3, 512-5 = 507 -> divisible by 3, 512-8 = 504 -> divisible by 3.

Thus, my analogy is that any number in this series with unit digit as 2 will be divisible by 3 if 2, 5 or 8 is subtracted from it.
User avatar
Oski
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools:INSEAD Class of July '10
Posts: 113
Kudos: 195
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scthakur
Thus, my analogy is that any number in this series with unit digit as 2 will be divisible by 3 if 2, 5 or 8 is subtracted from it.
I understand that.

But it is a BIG assumption.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!