Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:44 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
abhijit_sen
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Last visit: 10 May 2015
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 456
Kudos: 958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatnub
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Last visit: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
Posts: 393
Kudos: 1,680
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhijit_sen
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Last visit: 10 May 2015
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 456
Kudos: 958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As per OA, both of you had it wrong. I will post the OA after someone post the correct approach.
User avatar
mbawaters
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Posts: 145
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe its a combination of 1) and 2) that makes the figure a prallelogram. Agreed?
If yes then yes these lines should be parallel.
C.
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbawaters
I believe its a combination of 1) and 2) that makes the figure a prallelogram. Agreed?
If yes then yes these lines should be parallel.
C.

I disagree. There is no guarantee that it's going to be a parallelogram, solution is not unique.
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,575
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,575
Kudos: 687
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i agree we dont know of the relationship btw R1 and R2...

I too would guess E on this..
User avatar
apurva1985
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Last visit: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Pune
Posts: 126
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
even i will go with E
User avatar
mbawaters
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Posts: 145
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maratikus
mbawaters
I believe its a combination of 1) and 2) that makes the figure a prallelogram. Agreed?
If yes then yes these lines should be parallel.
C.

I disagree. There is no guarantee that it's going to be a parallelogram, solution is not unique.

A good thing to know here is that what is a minimum requirement for a quadrilateral to be a parallelogram? I thought having diagnolas bisecting and two of the opposite sides being equal was good enough a reason to assume this quadrilateral was a parallelogram.
User avatar
bhushangiri
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Last visit: 18 May 2012
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Posts: 69
Kudos: 518
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also thought the answer is B.

Bisecting diagonals is sufficient condition for || gm. BD and AC bisect and so ABCD is ||gm.

angle BCA = angle CAD
.5BCA = .5CAD

now for 2 lines R1 and R2, if the alternate angels formed by the transveral(AC) are equal, then R1 and R2 are parallel.

Wonder why not B then.
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbawaters
A good thing to know here is that what is a minimum requirement for a quadrilateral to be a parallelogram? I thought having diagnolas bisecting and two of the opposite sides being equal was good enough a reason to assume this quadrilateral was a parallelogram.

It says BD bisects AC. It doesn't say anywhere that BD and AC bisect each other.
User avatar
abhijit_sen
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Last visit: 10 May 2015
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 456
Kudos: 958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is C. Even I went for E. It does not make any sense to me either.
User avatar
mbawaters
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Posts: 145
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maratikus
mbawaters
A good thing to know here is that what is a minimum requirement for a quadrilateral to be a parallelogram? I thought having diagnolas bisecting and two of the opposite sides being equal was good enough a reason to assume this quadrilateral was a parallelogram.

It says BD bisects AC. It doesn't say anywhere that BD and AC bisect each other.

Sure! but we have two properties here

1) AB = DC
2) BD bisects AC

Can AB be equal to DC if AC also did not bisect BD? I was not able to come up with a case...
User avatar
bhushangiri
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Last visit: 18 May 2012
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Posts: 69
Kudos: 518
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maratikus

It says BD bisects AC. It doesn't say anywhere that BD and AC bisect each other.


Good catch there.. :x such things really hurt...
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbawaters
maratikus
mbawaters
A good thing to know here is that what is a minimum requirement for a quadrilateral to be a parallelogram? I thought having diagnolas bisecting and two of the opposite sides being equal was good enough a reason to assume this quadrilateral was a parallelogram.

It says BD bisects AC. It doesn't say anywhere that BD and AC bisect each other.

Sure! but we have two properties here

1) AB = DC
2) BD bisects AC

Can AB be equal to DC if AC also did not bisect BD? I was not able to come up with a case...

Follow my example, posted above.
E is the answer. Let's draw B close to A (AB is relatively small, say equal to 1) and C is far away from both A and B, for example AC = 10. Then we can draw a line through B and O, the middle of AC. If D belongs to that line than BD bisects AC. Let's draw a circle with the center in C and radius AB, it intersects line BO in two points. One of those points (D') gives parallel lines R1 and R2 because angle BCA = CAD', the other one doesn't because BCA is not equal to CAD''.
User avatar
Permuteer
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbawaters


1) AB = DC
2) BD bisects AC

Can AB be equal to DC if AC also did not bisect BD? I was not able to come up with a case...

Yes. AB can equal DC while AC does not bisect BD. Consider a trapezoid with the following dimensions AB=1, BC=1, CD=1, DA=2.
User avatar
Permuteer
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 2, by itself, tells us that AB must equal BC and that AD must equal CD. Imagining a kite (in which the vertical axis bisects the horizontal axis (but not vice-versa)) may make the rule easier to understand. Combining this conclusion with statement 1 indicates that all four segments in the perimeter must be equal (transitive rule of equalities), therefore, the figure is a rhombus (but not necessarily a square). Rhombuses are a class of parallelogram, so AC then becomes a transversal of two parallel lines so angle BCA = angle CAD.

Answer: C.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!