Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 14:42 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 14:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
charles77479a
Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Last visit: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
dczuchta
Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Last visit: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
61
 [1]
Posts: 13
Kudos: 61
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ssandeepan
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Last visit: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Posts: 116
Kudos: 1,741
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
dczuchta
Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Last visit: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My question to ssandeepan:

If what you say is true...and X and 10 have no similar prime factors, then how can the answer be 9?
The question asks which # can X be a multiple of. If X is a multiple of 9, then it can be 9 and then the disimilar factorization holds true but what if X is 18 (a multiple of 9)..then 18 and 10 have 2 as a common prime factor. I don't understand. Unless relatively prime natural numbers only include common even prime factorization? Help! Now it's become my question..thanks
avatar
hodunze
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Last visit: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[color=#BF0000]you may have received the answer to these problems by now. I still want to share with you what I think, let me know what the solution is.

For problem 1

Prime numbers are numbers that can divide into 2 with a remender of 1.
I think that the answer to that problem is A

If you multiply 9*9 = 81, 10 + 81 = 91

91 will divide into 2 with remainder 1
User avatar
scthakur
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the source of question. I have learnt a new term "relative prime number" and its definition.
User avatar
ritula
Joined: 18 May 2008
Last visit: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Posts: 694
Kudos: 3,210
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice explanation +1
icandy
charles77479a
1:if x and 10 are relatively prime natural numbers, then x could be a multiple of
a: 9
b: 18
c:4
d:25
e:14

Relative prime numbers are numbers which have 1 as their Greatest common factor.

look at the Q, it says could be. lets look for which cannot be

18, 10 have 2 as a common divisor which is > 1

(4,10) (25,10) (14,10) all have divisors such as 2, 5 which are greater than 1. If the numbers themselves have GCF's other than 1, their multiples also will have GCF other than 1.

(9,10) have their greatest common factor as 1. even though (18,10) have 2 as common factor, 9 still serves our answer "could be"


2:the area of ADE is 12 square units. If B is the midpoint of AD and C is the midpoint of AE, what is the area of ABC.
a:2 s/u
b:3 s/u
c:3.5 s/u
d:4 square units
e: 6 square units

Once we figure out that these triangles are similar triangles, we need to

Area of large triangle = (s ^ 2) * area of small triangle

where s is similarity ratio. We see that each side of big triangle is twice the small triangle

12 = 4 * area of small triangle -> 3


I know the answer to these questions; however, i do not understand how to solve the problem. If someone could explain them in details, i would really appreciate it. Thank you very much.
User avatar
ssandeepan
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Last visit: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Posts: 116
Kudos: 1,741
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dczuchta ,

The question 1 asks , then x could be a multiple of..it does not say X will be a multiple of .



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!