Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 18:37 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 18:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
347
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vr4indian
Joined: 22 Sep 2008
Last visit: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Posts: 63
Kudos: 148
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aim2010
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Last visit: 16 Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Posts: 15
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 347
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice solution, aim2010. I solved it exactly the same way.
User avatar
lylya4
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Last visit: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Posts: 41
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aim2010
a number that satisfies both requirements can be expressed as n(n+1)/2 and k^2.

Since it is the same number:

n(n+1)/2=k^2
=> n(n+1) = 2 * k^2

careful observation reveals that we are looking for a positive integer that can be expressed as a product of two consecutive positive integers and also as double of a perfect square.

quick things to realize:
1. two consecutive positive integers would never have a common factor (except 1 which we can ignore)
2. two consecutive positive integers would have one odd and one even integer
3. odd integer has to be a perfect square
4. 2 is a factor of only the even integer which would cancel out the 2 from the other side of the equation
5. after the factor 2 is taken out of the even integer, it is also a perfect square

now lets start looking for odd perfect squares whose adjacent even integer is double of a perfect square.

1 and 2 - our number is 1 * 2 /2 = 1
9 and 8 - our number is 9 * 8 /2 = 36
25 - reject, 24 or 26 do not satisfy
49 and 50 - our number is 49 * 50 /2 = 1225

for these similar questions, I won't go so far, esp to many calculations, up to 49(!!!), should we just replace the number from the choices and

check n(n+1) = 2 * k^2 if n is integer
User avatar
aim2010
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Last visit: 16 Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Posts: 15
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lylya4


for these similar questions, I won't go so far, esp to many calculations, up to 49(!!!), should we just replace the number from the choices and

check n(n+1) = 2 * k^2 if n is integer

it makes sense to a certain extent, though there are two reasons I would not test answer choices:
1. Imagine checking 5 four digit numbers if they are perfect squares and if all of them are, then doubling them and checking their factors to come up with two consecutive integers as two exhaustive factors
2. checking answer choices at times gives me a feeling that maybe i missed something, what if i do a mistake and two choices seem to satisfy.

moreover, for going till 49 we just went till 7 after counting 1, 3 and 5. remember we were looking for odd perfect squares. IMO, its up to each person's choice. bottom line is to not bang your head on something for 4 minutes unless you have a gut feeling that you are going in the right direction.
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,396
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,396
Kudos: 10,847
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks maraticus for a good question and aim2010 for a nice explanation :)
+1+1
User avatar
lylya4
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Last visit: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Posts: 41
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aim2010
lylya4


for these similar questions, I won't go so far, esp to many calculations, up to 49(!!!), should we just replace the number from the choices and

check n(n+1) = 2 * k^2 if n is integer

it makes sense to a certain extent, though there are two reasons I would not test answer choices:
1. Imagine checking 5 four digit numbers if they are perfect squares and if all of them are, then doubling them and checking their factors to come up with two consecutive integers as two exhaustive factors
2. checking answer choices at times gives me a feeling that maybe i missed something, what if i do a mistake and two choices seem to satisfy.

moreover, for going till 49 we just went till 7 after counting 1, 3 and 5. remember we were looking for odd perfect squares. IMO, its up to each person's choice. bottom line is to not bang your head on something for 4 minutes unless you have a gut feeling that you are going in the right direction.

i still think its easier to check the choices

remember k^2 = X

So n(n+1) = 2X <=> n^2 + 2n - 2X = 0, you replace X with the answer choice and solve the equation, if n is integer, take X

much faster
User avatar
ritula
Joined: 18 May 2008
Last visit: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Posts: 694
Kudos: 3,210
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
That seems to be a better approach
lylya4
aim2010
lylya4


for these similar questions, I won't go so far, esp to many calculations, up to 49(!!!), should we just replace the number from the choices and

check n(n+1) = 2 * k^2 if n is integer

it makes sense to a certain extent, though there are two reasons I would not test answer choices:
1. Imagine checking 5 four digit numbers if they are perfect squares and if all of them are, then doubling them and checking their factors to come up with two consecutive integers as two exhaustive factors
2. checking answer choices at times gives me a feeling that maybe i missed something, what if i do a mistake and two choices seem to satisfy.

moreover, for going till 49 we just went till 7 after counting 1, 3 and 5. remember we were looking for odd perfect squares. IMO, its up to each person's choice. bottom line is to not bang your head on something for 4 minutes unless you have a gut feeling that you are going in the right direction.

i still think its easier to check the choices

remember k^2 = X

So n(n+1) = 2X n^2 + 2n - 2X = 0, you replace X with the answer choice and solve the equation, if n is integer, take X

much faster



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!