Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
B 1. Range of 4 means that at least two odd integers form boundaries of the range: X _ X, where X - odd integer, _ - a vacation.
2. Now let's add one more odd integer. There is 2 unique placements for third integer with respect to SD: (X,X) _ X and X X X. X _ (X,X) has the same SD as the first option.
3. Let's add fourth odd integer:
(X,X,X) _ X (X,X) X X (X,X) _ (X,X) X (X,X) X
Other options have the same SD, for example, (X,X) X X and X X (X,X).
Hi..Thanks for pointing out. Can you tell me a easiest way to find the SD?
Is there a way to determine what the SD is by looking at the numbers if they have digits repeating?
Show more
Here I didn't calculate SD to figure out that 3,3,3,7 and 3,7,7,7 have the same SD. It is just symmetry approach. Anyway, in 95% cases it is helpful to think about SD as an average deviation of x from xav. In other words SD = sqrt(sum(x^2-xav^2))/n ~ sum(|x-xav|)/n For example, 3,3,3,7 has xav=16/4=4 and SD ~ (1+1+1+3)/4 ~ 1.5 3,7,7,7 has xav=24/4=6 and SD ~ (3+1+1+1)/4 ~ 1.5
Hi..Thanks for pointing out. Can you tell me a easiest way to find the SD?
Is there a way to determine what the SD is by looking at the numbers if they have digits repeating?
Here I didn't calculate SD to figure out that 3,3,3,7 and 3,7,7,7 have the same SD. It is just symmetry approach. Anyway, in 95% cases it is helpful to think about SD as an average deviation of x from xav. In other words SD = sqrt(sum(x^2-xav^2))/n ~ sum(|x-xav|)/n For example, 3,3,3,7 has xav=16/4=4 and SD ~ (1+1+1+3)/4 ~ 1.5 3,7,7,7 has xav=24/4=6 and SD ~ (3+1+1+1)/4 ~ 1.5
Show more
Just to add to the above discussion.
if you calculate (element - mean) and sum them up for each of the above group in which SD is same, it comes to 0 for each of them.
ex: for 3,3,5,7 -----> -1.5,-1.5, .5, 2.5
if we sum these up its 0. same is the case for other three in the group. But again the sum comes to 0 for each of the 4 group and we can not say that SD is same for all of them. we've to use some kind of symmetry to diffrentiate between those. In this case the symmetry between 3,3,5,7 and 3,5,7,7 is like 4,4,8,10 and 4,6,10,10.
if you calculate (element - mean) and sum them up for each of the above group in which SD is same, it comes to 0 for each of them.
ex: for 3,3,5,7 -----> -1.5,-1.5, .5, 2.5
if we sum these up its 0. same is the case for other three in the group. But again the sum comes to 0 for each of the 4 group and we can not say that SD is same for all of them.
Show more
the sum of (element - mean) is always 0 for any set because it is a mean point and it is one of its definition. Maybe I haven't understood you correctly but I used |element - mean|
neeshpal
we've to use some kind of symmetry to differentiate between those. In this case the symmetry between 3,3,5,7 and 3,5,7,7 is like 4,4,8,10 and 4,6,10,10.
Show more
Perhaps, it would be also useful to mention some properties of SD and translate symmetry to math expressions:
1. SD({x})=SD({x+k}) 2. SD({x})=SD({-x})
In our case with 3,3,5,7 we can use (10-x) transformation and get 7,7,5,3 set (10-3,10-3,10-5,10-7)
if you calculate (element - mean) and sum them up for each of the above group in which SD is same, it comes to 0 for each of them.
ex: for 3,3,5,7 -----> -1.5,-1.5, .5, 2.5
if we sum these up its 0. same is the case for other three in the group. But again the sum comes to 0 for each of the 4 group and we can not say that SD is same for all of them.
the sum of (element - mean) is always 0 for any set because it is a mean point and it is one of its definition. Maybe I haven't understood you correctly but I used |element - mean|
neeshpal
we've to use some kind of symmetry to differentiate between those. In this case the symmetry between 3,3,5,7 and 3,5,7,7 is like 4,4,8,10 and 4,6,10,10.
Perhaps, it would be also useful to mention some properties of SD and translate symmetry to math expressions:
1. SD({x})=SD({x+k}) 2. SD({x})=SD({-x})
In our case with 3,3,5,7 we can use (10-x) transformation and get 7,7,5,3 set (10-3,10-3,10-5,10-7)
Show more
I was a bit confused within myself when i wrote the above comment. I did not mean to point out anything.
OA:B OE - (B) For the sake of simplicity, let the smallest number in J be 1. Since the range is 4, the largest number in J is 5. You may recall that the standard deviation of a set of numbers is the square root of its variance. How many different variances are possible? { 1, 1, 1, 5 } and { 1, 5, 5, 5 } will have the same variance. Why? Remember that the variance is the average squared difference between each element and the mean of the set of numbers. The first set above has a mean of 2, whereas the mean of the second set is 4– in the first set, three elements are 1 unit from the mean and the other element is 3 units from the mean. This is true of the second set, too. These two sets, then, have a variance of 12/4. Similarly, { 1, 1, 3, 5 } (mean 2.5) and { 1, 3, 5, 5 } (mean 3.5) will have the same variance: in each set, two elements are 1.5 units from the mean, one element is 0.5 unit from the mean, and the remaining element is 2.5 units from the mean– these two sets have a variance of 11/4. Finally, {1, 3, 3, 5} and {1, 1, 5, 5} have variances of 8/4 and 16/4 respectively. So, 4 different variances and thus four different standard deviations are possible. Answer: B
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.