Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 17:23 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 17:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
smcgrath12
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Last visit: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 742
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,652
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
smcgrath12
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Last visit: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 742
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
smcgrath12
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Last visit: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 742
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paul
12 days
since there are 16 raining days and workers are at 50% of capacity then, it will take an extra 16 days to finish job. But for every 4 rainy days, there is another 1 day recuperated. Hence, 16-4=12 days extra. Is it me or all the rest of the info is just extraneous?


Actually, your way of thinking is faster. There is only one flaw in your logic. As they worked for 16 days at 50% efficiency, it would have taken extra 16 days to finish job (ONLY IF THEY WORKED AT 50% efficiency). But as they start working at 100% after those 16 days, they are in the deficit of only 16/2 = 8 days. As 4 extra days are provided, the answer is 4. What do you think?
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,652
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, I see the flaw in my reasoning :hammer Clearly, 4 should be it.
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the first place, I don't know how the company came up with the idea of just needing one day extra if it rained for 4 days.

You see, 80 days = 100% of job

For 4 days, you complete 5% of the job, and that's on a good day. If it rains, you only get 2.5% because of 50% drop in efficiency
Now you have 76 days remaining to complete the job, that translates to 95% of the job
So total job completed = 97.5%. You need to complete another 2.5%. This is equivalent to (2.5/100)*80days = 2 days more (assuming on a good day) and 4 days more (assuming rainy days)

So the company should be allocating 84 days to complete the job (better to consider worst case). But the question says the company expects it to be done in 81 days ? How can that be?
User avatar
lastochka
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Last visit: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 193
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
great problem, thanks to smc for clear explanation



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!