Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 15:53 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 15:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Jinglander
Joined: 24 May 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 66
Kudos: 250
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sag
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Last visit: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 103
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Jinglander
Joined: 24 May 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 66
Kudos: 250
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
811,276
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,276
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jinglander
Yes but why n-1 ! And not n! Can you give some more color so I can understand

Posted from my mobile device

The number of arrangements of n distinct objects in a row is given by \(n!\).
The number of arrangements of n distinct objects in a circle is given by \((n-1)!\).

From Gmat Club Math Book (combinatorics chapter):
"The difference between placement in a row and that in a circle is following: if we shift all object by one position, we will get different arrangement in a row but the same relative arrangement in a circle. So, for the number of circular arrangements of n objects we have:

\(R = \frac{n!}{n} = (n-1)!\)"

\((n-1)!=(5-1)!=24\)

Check Combinatorics chapter of Math Book for more (link in my signature).

Hope it helps.
User avatar
GAL064
Joined: 07 Feb 2016
Last visit: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 17
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a circle there are n-1 ways to arrange a group
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,658
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One way to think about it, and these problems in general, is to start by counting the possibilities 'naively'. It seems logical that there should be 5! ways to arrange 5 people around a round table, so start with 5!. Then, account for any special circumstances by figuring out whether you actually counted any of the possibilities more than once. In this case, you actually counted each separate possibility five times by using 5!. For instance, you counted these five arrangements as being different, but they're actually the same (since they're just rotations around the table):

(A B C D E)
(B C D E A)
(C D E A B)
(D E A B C)
(E A B C D)

In order to correct for the overcounting, you'll divide by 5. 5!/5 = 4!, or 24.

This works for a wide range of counting problems. Suppose you wanted to know how many ways a class of eight people could be split into two groups of four. Naively, there are 8*7*6*5 ways to select the first group of four (after which the second group is determined). But you've overcounted by doing that, since you actually counted these groups as being different:

A B C D
B C D A
B A C D
... etc.

That is, you counted each different group 4! times. So, the actual answer is (8*7*6*5)/4!, which is equivalent to what you'd get from the combinatorics formula.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!