Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 Jun 2010, 00:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
I'm not sure where to post this since I am not looking for an answer to a specific problem, rather confirmation on a potential number property. If true, I'd use it for data sufficienty so I'm posting here.
I am familiar with the following property: The sum of n consecutive integers is divisible by n if n is odd, but it is not divisible by n if n is even.
This makes logical sense. However, I was curious about scenarios in which n=even, so started messing around with numbers. After experimenting with several sets, it appears that if n=even, the sum of n consecutive integers is divisible by n/2. I've tested this with many number sets and it appears to be true. Can anyone confirm?
I am familiar with the following property: The sum of n consecutive integers is divisible by n if n is odd, but it is not divisible by n if n is even.
This makes logical sense. However, I was curious about scenarios in which n=even, so started messing around with numbers. After experimenting with several sets, it appears that if n=even, the sum of n consecutive integers is divisible by n/2. I've tested this with many number sets and it appears to be true. Can anyone confirm?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
14 Jun 2010, 03:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
Yes, your assumption must be true. Because, sum of n consecutive integers is n(n+1)/2. Now, if you take N as odd, sum would always be divisible by n. Because, sum would be n*some integer (since n+1 would be even, if n is odd and it would definitely be divisible by 2).
Similarly, if n is even, n(n+1)/2 would covert to n/2 as integer as n is even and n+1 which will be an odd number.
Hence, by algebraically, you can come to this conclusion. Please let me know if you have any queries on the explanation.
Similarly, if n is even, n(n+1)/2 would covert to n/2 as integer as n is even and n+1 which will be an odd number.
Hence, by algebraically, you can come to this conclusion. Please let me know if you have any queries on the explanation.
15 Jun 2010, 01:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
vinay,
I would like to post a correction here regarding your post if you dont mind. You have told that sum of n consecutive integers is n(n+1)/2 which is only correct if your first integer is 1. If you start your series with any other number than 1, this formula is no more vaild.
I would like to post a correction here regarding your post if you dont mind. You have told that sum of n consecutive integers is n(n+1)/2 which is only correct if your first integer is 1. If you start your series with any other number than 1, this formula is no more vaild.
