Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(00:24)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 23
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Here it goes:
A racing dog ran 40 races before retiring at age 4. How many races did he win?
(1) He won his first 30 races, all run before the age of 4.
(2) He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4, won none of his last 10 races, and won 75 percent of his races overall.
In this question, do you guys think the question asked has a good wording? It does not clarify as to till what point in the dog's life they want to know how many races did the dog win.
Do we have to assume that they are asking abt races won before retirement? (I know some of you will shout "ofcourse!")
Shouldnt the question read "How many races did he win till he retired?"
Or, am i overanalyzing a simple question?
Whenever i assume such simple things in DS word problems such as those with games won, races won, etc, it turns out normally that I should not have assumed anything though it seemed like commonsense. When i get smart and start not assuming such simple things, they dont like my answers either!
What the hell is going on with me!?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Here it goes: A racing dog ran 40 races before retiring at age 4. How many races did he win?
(1) He won his first 30 races, all run before the age of 4. (2) He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4, won none of his last 10 races, and won 75 percent of his races overall.
Show more
I think I agree with you but for a different reason. Why say "He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4" and then say "won 75 percent of his races overall"? From that I infer that "overall" does not equal "before age 4."
A clearer question would have had the dog die at age 4.
Here it goes: A racing dog ran 40 races before retiring at age 4. How many races did he win?
(1) He won his first 30 races, all run before the age of 4. (2) He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4, won none of his last 10 races, and won 75 percent of his races overall.
I think I agree with you but for a different reason. Why say "He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4" and then say "won 75 percent of his races overall"? From that I infer that "overall" does not equal "before age 4."
A clearer question would have had the dog die at age 4.
Show more
I disagree with that.
Racing dog is only for race. If he is retired, he won't join race any more.
Well, we can say he is "dead", which means jobless.
S(1) tells us he won his first 30 races, but we do not know how many races he won at the rest 10 races, it is insufficient.
S(2) is kind of woody. "He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4" means he won 75 percent of his races before age 4, which is equal to say "he won 75 percent of his races overall". Therefore, he won 30 races (75 percent of 40 races); It is sufficient.
Hence, the answer is B.
If you ask me why they put the sentence "won none of his last 10 races" in S(2), I will say that is a tricky thing. However, If you put S(1) and S(2) together, it will be kind of story, the racing dog won the first 30 races and lost the rest 10 races. Maybe that is why he retired, I guess.
#1 - not sufficient since it gives infor only on the first 30 won.
#2 - sufficient even though its wordy, but it does give enough info to find out 30 races were won since he won 75% of all races ran which i 40 - as in previous post - .75x40= 30
hope that helps
my answer - B
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.