Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
1. x when divided by 2y gives a remainder of 4
x = (2y)*k + 4
Seems insufficient.
2. (x+y) when divided by y gives a remainder of 4
x+y = ky + 4
x = (k-1)y + 4
Sufficient. Remainder will be 4.
Moreover,
(x+y)/y (remaider 4) can be simplified to x/y + y/y. Since y/y never has a remainder, regardless of the value of y, the remainder when x is divided by y will always be the same as the remainder when (x+y)y.
No, consider the following example: If X=10, Y=3. 10/(2*3) leaves remainder 4. Great. But 10/3 leaves remainder 1.
Show more
I really tried to do this algebraically, and then I broke down and plugged in. I think it's a great question, and I (personally) found it difficult to wrap my head around it without some numbers.
I tried a couple options for number 1. 24/10 and 24/5 gave the same remainder. Then I searched my head for a number that's divisible by something but not twice that something. I came up with 60/8 and 60/4.
I know this is a little sloppy, but when I laid out the algebra, I just couldn't see it.
For 2, I tried just one example and then it all made sense. Remainders are set up kind of like multiples. If I divide a number by 5 and get some remainder, then 5 more than that number will give me the same remainder. That's what number 2 is saying, and it was clear right away that it's sufficient.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.