Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I think i follow the logic here, BUT the way the equations are set up with all the tiny letters isnt as clear.
1. No relationship with k/m2- INS
2. Again no relationship - INS
Combined:
n/m= Int. so n= (Int)(m)
Substitute k/(Int x m)2= INTEGER SUFFICIENT
Does that seem right? Ian77 any feedback or simpler solution. I followed your previous example, just looked at the relationships then when combining I substituted. Anything else to keep in mind
I think i follow the logic here, BUT the way the equations are set up with all the tiny letters isnt as clear.
1. No relationship with k/m2- INS
2. Again no relationship - INS
Combined:
n/m= Int. so n= (Int)(m)
Substitute k/(Int x m)2= INTEGER SUFFICIENT
Does that seem right? Ian77 any feedback or simpler solution. I followed your previous example, just looked at the relationships then when combining I substituted. Anything else to keep in mind
Show more
That's basically right. The way I read it is like this:
1. k/n^2 is an integer has nothing to do with m.
2. n/m is an integer has nothing to do with k.
Together, I see that m divides perfectly into n, and n perfectly into k. Since m is inside m, then m must be inside n when n^2 is going into k, so m^2 must also go into k.
Think about the fact that 24/12 is an integer and 12/6 is an integer. That must mean that there's a 6 in 12, and since everything that's in 12 cancels out with 24, then the 6 must have cancelled out, so 24/6 must also be an integer.
Basically, if a number is divisible by another number, it will also be divisible by all of the second number's factors.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.