In the fraction x/y, where x and y are positive integers, what is the

Question

In the fraction x/y, where x and y are positive integers, what is the value of y ?

(1) The least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6.
(2) x = 1

Bunuel · Accepted Answer

SOLUTION

In the fraction x/y, where x and y are positive integers, what is the value of y ?

(1) The least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6 --> LCM of y and 3 is is 6 --> y=2 or y=6. Not sufficient.

(2) x = 1 --> no info about y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) y can still be 2 or 6. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Bunuel · Answer

The least common denominator is the least common multiple of the denominators of a set of fractions. For example, the least common denominator of 1/2 and 1/3 is 6.

herbgatherer · Answer

Bunuel, I couldn't follow what this sentence means: "The least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6 " . What is the Least common denominator?! So, are they just saying that the least common multiple between y and 3 is 6?

sadikabid27 · Answer

Bunuel  can I have more math questions link (PS+DS) like this to practice?

Bunuel · Answer

Could not find questions similar to this one but the links below should help to master divisibility/multiples/factors questions.

5. Divisibility/Multiples/Factors 
     Theory   
 Divisibility and Remainders on the GMAT 
 Tips and hints: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors 
 3 Deadly Mistakes you must avoid in LCM-GCD Questions 
 How Well Do You Know Your Factors? 
 THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO STUDY LEAST COMMON MULTIPLES ON THE GMAT 
     Questions   
 The E-GMAT Primes Trio - 3 Ques on No. of factors & Prime factors 
 DS Questions 
 PS Questions

For other subjects:
 ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT ! ! ! 
 Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread

energetics · Answer

(1) The least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6. 
 Bunuel   VeritasKarishma   chetan2u   IanStewart  or other experts, can you explain why we read this statement to mean "y and 3 have LCM of 6" and not "x/y times 1/3 is x/6?"

I read it as the latter... so I got C (see below)

For (1):
1/3*1/2 = 1/6
1/3*3/6 = 1/6
multiple values for x (1,3) and for y (2,6), insufficient

(2) x = 1  no info about y, insufficient

(1&2) 
if x=1, y=2 ... (1/3)*(1/2) = 1/6, Ok
x can't be 3 so (1/3)*(3/6) is not possible now. 
Sufficient since there's a definite value for x, y

IanStewart · Answer

Because that's not what that sentence means. You might think of what the same sentence would mean if you had numbers everywhere, instead of letters. If I were to talk about the "least common denominator of the fractions 1/4 and 1/6", I wouldn't be talking about the  product  of 1/4 and 1/6, or of 4 and 6. The answer would not be 24. Instead I'd be talking about the smallest common denominator we could make, if we wanted to, say, add those two fractions -- and that's exactly what the Least Common Multiple is. The answer would be 12, the LCM of 4 and 6.

energetics · Answer

Thanks Ian, that clears it up.

If it was worded "the least common denominator of the product of x/y and 1/3 is 6" then it would be solved as I wrote above?

LeoN88 · Answer

this article will help you:- https://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/ ... nator.html

IanStewart · Answer

That sentence wouldn't mean anything - it would be like saying "the least common multiple of 6 is 6". If you are talking about the "least  common  multiple", you are talking about a multiple that is common to two (or more) numbers. In the same way, if you talk about a least common denominator, you are talking about a denominator common to two or more fractions. In your sentence, you're only talking about the denominator of a single fraction, the product of the fractions you mention.

But I think I may now understand how you're interpreting the wording. I think you're interpreting it to mean something like "the lowest possible denominator (if everything stays an integer) of the product of x/y and 1/3 is 6", or "if (x/y)(1/3) were completely reduced, its denominator would be 6". But if that's what the question meant, they would need to use different phrasing - they would need to talk about reducing that fraction completely, and not about "least common denominators".

ScottTargetTestPrep · Answer

Solution:

Statement One Only:

The least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6.

If the least common denominator of x/y and 1/3 is 6, then y could be either 2 or 6. Since y does not have a unique value, statement one is not sufficient.

Statement Two Only:
 
x = 1

This does not tell us anything about the value of y; statement two is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using the two statements, we have: the least common denominator of 1/y and 1/3 is 6. However, again, y could be either 2 or 6. The two statements together are not sufficient.

Answer: E

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

In the fraction x/y, where x and y are positive integers, what is the

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions

In the fraction x/y, where x and y are positive integers, what is the

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards