Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 02:44 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 02:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Try st2 first:
x-1 = -2
x = -1 --> nothing about n, insufficient.

try st1:
If x is even, say 2, then:
n^2-n < 0 if n is a positive integer
n^2-n < 0 if n is a positive fraction

If x is odd, say 3, then:
n^3-n < 0 if n is a negative integer
n^3-n < 0 if n is a positive fraction

We don't know status of n, insufficient.

Using both:
1/n - n <0> 0 --> out
If n = positive integer, say 3, then 1/n-n <0> possible
If n = negative fraction, say -1/3, then 1/n-n <0> possible
If n = negative integer, say -3, then 1/n-n > 0 --> out

Two possibilites for n, insufficient.

E for me.
User avatar
jimmyjamesdonkey
Joined: 01 May 2007
Last visit: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 484
Own Kudos:
Posts: 484
Kudos: 1,551
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How would you rate this problem --> Easy/Medium/Hard in terms of what you would find on the GMAT DS?
User avatar
Andr359
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Last visit: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
Posts: 169
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) (n^x) – n < 0

(2) x–1 = –2



(1) Insuf right away.

(2) Same as (1).

(1&2) x = -1, then: 1/n - n = (1-n^2)/n < 1, which holds for (-1, 0) and (1, oo+), therefore E.
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think more. OA is not 'E'



now its your turn to release the OA.
User avatar
sumande
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 18 Oct 2012
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) (n^x) – n < 0

(2) x–1 = –2

OA later...


I go with C.

From both statements together: (1-n^2)/n < 0

If n < -1, both numerator and denominator will be less than 0, and (1-n^2)/n will be greater than zero.

So, n can be within (-1,0) to satisfy the inequality. Hence, |n| < 1. (C)
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is 'C'.

Stmt1:
n^x -n < 0
n[n^(x-1) - 1] < 0
n < 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 > 0 or n > 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 < 0

Lets say
n < 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 > 0
n = -4 , x =3 ===> |n| > 1
n=-1/2, x =-1 ====> |n| < 1
So INSUFF

Now n > 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 < 0
n =2 , x =5/4 ====>|n| > 1
n=1/2 , x=5 ====>|n| < 1
So INSUFF

Stmt2: clearly INSUFF

Taken them together:
n> 0 and n^(-3/2) < 1 or n< 0 and n^(-3/2) > 1
for n> 0,
n * sqrt(n) > 1
|n| > 1


For n < 0 NOT POSSIBLE as sqrt(n) requires n to be +ve.

Hence SUFF
User avatar
wudy
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Last visit: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is 'C'.

Stmt1:
n^x -n < 0
n[n^(x-1) - 1] < 0
n <0> 0 or n > 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 < 0

Lets say
n <0> 0
n = -4 , x =3 ===> |n| > 1
n=-1/2, x =-1 ====> |n| <1> 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 <0>|n| > 1
n=1/2 , x=5 ====>|n| <1> 0 and n^(-3/2) < 1 or n<0> 1
for n> 0,
n * sqrt(n) > 1
|n| > 1


For n < 0 NOT POSSIBLE as sqrt(n) requires n to be +ve.

Hence SUFF


(1)n^x<n
(2)x=-1
(1)+(2): n^(-1)<n 1/n<n
case 1:if 0<n; 1<n^2; 1<n
case 2:if n<0; n^2<1; -1<n<0
Answer is E.

The two cases listed below will call answer C into question.
case 1: n=10, x=-1; comply (1) and (2), 1<|n|
case 2: n=-0.5, x=-1; comply (1) and (2), |n|<1
User avatar
trahul4
Joined: 16 May 2007
Last visit: 16 Mar 2014
Posts: 434
Own Kudos:
Posts: 434
Kudos: 277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will go with C .

Agree with vshaunak.
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
wudy
OA is 'C'.

Stmt1:
n^x -n < 0
n[n^(x-1) - 1] < 0
n <0> 0 or n > 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 < 0

Lets say
n <0> 0
n = -4 , x =3 ===> |n| > 1
n=-1/2, x =-1 ====> |n| <1> 0 and n^(x-1) - 1 <0>|n| > 1
n=1/2 , x=5 ====>|n| <1> 0 and n^(-3/2) < 1 or n<0> 1
for n> 0,
n * sqrt(n) > 1
|n| > 1


For n < 0 NOT POSSIBLE as sqrt(n) requires n to be +ve.

Hence SUFF

(1)n^x<n
(2)x=-1
(1)+(2): n^(-1)<n 1/n<n
case 1:if 0<n; 1<n^2; 1<n
case 2:if n<0; n^2<1; -1<n<0
Answer is E.

The two cases listed below will call answer C into question.
case 1: n=10, x=-1; comply (1) and (2), 1<|n|
case 2: n=-0.5, x=-1; comply (1) and (2), |n|<1


n can't be -ve as n^-3/2 will be undefined for -ve values of n.
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apologies....
I put the stmt2 wrongly.
The correct stmt2 is x^-1 = -2
I have edited the question.
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apologies....
I put the stmt2 wrongly.
The correct stmt2 is x^-1 = -2
I have edited the question.



:roll: :shock: :shock:
User avatar
Himalayan
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Posts: 383
Kudos: 633
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dahcrap
Apologies....
I put the stmt2 wrongly.
The correct stmt2 is x^-1 = -2
I have edited the question.

Even still I would stick with E


seems it makes sense now cuz x = -1/2 and (n^x) <n> 1. if n is 1 or less than 1 but grater than 0, (n^x) < (n) doesnot hold true. so it should be C.
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dahcrap
Apologies....
I put the stmt2 wrongly.
The correct stmt2 is x^-1 = -2
I have edited the question.

Even still I would stick with E


I am not sure how to approach this problem... but
does n^-1/2 mean we take the negative square root?

or do we go about it like this:

if n=1/4, (1/4)^-1/2 = 1/sqrt(1/4) = 1/1/2 =2. |2-.25|>1

if n=4 4^-1/2 = 1/sqrt4 = 1/2. |.5-4| > 1


i'd go with C



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
109927 posts
GMAT Tutor
1922 posts