boubi
i don't know dude maybe you are right... i just rely on my intuitive skills for this...maybe can i explain my reasonning.
first 8C3 is the total way to choose a group of 3 among 8 people
then i substract the way you can choose a team of three withou siblings thus the first in the group will have 8 possibilities 8C1 then the second will have only 6 possiblities (we substract their siblings that cannot be part of the group) 6C1 and so on to 4C1.
however we hav implied an order in multipliyng the C's and we don't want one, so i divide by 3!....
hope i am right...
can you explain your reasoning?
Not sure I understand what you mean...
But here's what I was thinking:
Let the siblings be the following:
AB
CD
EF
GH
We are obviously in agreement that there are 56 ways to make a group of 3 without the sibling restriction. I think it is easier to count how many of those 56 ways have siblings in them.
So, when A and B are in a group, C, D, E, F, G, and H can also be matched with them. So 6 of those ways have A and B in the same group. The same logic can be applied for the other three pairs. When C and D are in a group, A, B, E, F, G, and H can be matched with them to make the group of three. SO 6*4 because there are four pairs of siblings is 24 groups in which there are siblings. So there are 56-24 groups without siblings.
Does this make sense? Maybe I'm wrong...