Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 14:00 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 14:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aliensoybean
Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Last visit: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
22
 [2]
Posts: 35
Kudos: 22
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bmwhype2
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1,333
Own Kudos:
5,552
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,333
Kudos: 5,552
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bmwhype2
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1,333
Own Kudos:
5,552
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,333
Kudos: 5,552
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
enfinity
Joined: 12 May 2009
Last visit: 12 Oct 2014
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 41
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi!

I found a pretty similar problem in the following book: "Probability for dummies" - just look it up on Google Books and search for the following string within the book: "Soma". You will find a very similar problem that is solved using aliensoybean's approach.

So my question is why are the posts in this forum right and the book wrong (or maybe both are right but please explain to me :)

Thanks!
Steve
User avatar
powerka
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2016
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 100
Kudos: 573
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
enfinity
Hi!

I found a pretty similar problem in the following book: "Probability for dummies" - just look it up on Google Books and search for the following string within the book: "Soma". You will find a very similar problem that is solved using aliensoybean's approach.

So my question is why are the posts in this forum right and the book wrong (or maybe both are right but please explain to me :)

Thanks!
Steve

Steve,

The approach presented above is correct.

If you want, post here the similar problem you mentioned, and I'll have a go at it.

Cheers
User avatar
enfinity
Joined: 12 May 2009
Last visit: 12 Oct 2014
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 41
Kudos: 241
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks man! Here it comes:

You have four friends: Jim, Arun, Soma, and Eric. How many ways can you rearrange the individuals in a row so that Soma and Eric do not sit next to each other.

My approach (and the one presented in the book i've mentioned):

Find all possibilities: 4!=24 (certain scenarios are not possible; therefore, we need to subtract these impossibilities):

Find the ways in which S and E sit next to each other:

E S _ _
_ E S _
_ _ E S

OR

S E _ _
_ S E _
_ _ S E

Therefore, 24 - 6 = 18
User avatar
powerka
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2016
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 100
Kudos: 573
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
enfinity
Thanks man! Here it comes:

You have four friends: Jim, Arun, Soma, and Eric. How many ways can you rearrange the individuals in a row so that Soma and Eric do not sit next to each other.

My approach (and the one presented in the book i've mentioned):

Find all possibilities: 4!=24 (certain scenarios are not possible; therefore, we need to subtract these impossibilities):

Find the ways in which S and E sit next to each other:

E S _ _
_ E S _
_ _ E S

OR

S E _ _
_ S E _
_ _ S E

Therefore, 24 - 6 = 18

This approach is similar to the other one, but it has a mistake.

1st. All possibilities = 4! = 24
2nd. Take ES as 1 person. So now we have 3 people: J, A & ES --> 3! = 6
3nd. Finally, it is necessary to account for different arrangements within ES --> 2! = 2
=> All - P (they DO sit together) = 24 - 3! * 2! = 24 - 12 = 12

By multiplying by 3 instead of 3! you are not accounting for the different positions of J and A. Have a look at the following:

S E J A
J S E A
J A S E

Is not the same as

S E A J
A S E J
A J S E

But the approach presented on that book does not take that into account.


Back to the original problem:
=> All - P (they DO sit together) = 6! - 5! * 2! = 720 - 120 * 2 = 480


Hope that helps.

Also, please know that probability is not my forte.
avatar
srivas
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Last visit: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 95
Kudos: 315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMPJBC go to movie and they sit in adjacent row of 6 seats. But, MJ cannot sit next to each other. How many different arrangements are possible?

Soln:
Arrangements in which MJ sit together is = 5! * 2!
Total Arrangemets possible with 6 people is = 6!

Arrangements in which MJ dont sit together is
= Total arrangements - Arrangements where they sit together
= 6! - 5! * 2!
= 480 ways
avatar
indir0ver
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Last visit: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nice one.

1 - p(when they sit together) , the manhattan link was really helpful. thx
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,954
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,954
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderator:
Math Expert
109729 posts