Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 23:53 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 23:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
I3igDmsu
Joined: 25 May 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
I3igDmsu
Joined: 25 May 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I3igDmsu
What answer are you getting if you use conjugates?

There's no reason to use conjugates here, but if you did, you'd find:

root(5) + 1 to 2
= [root(5) + 1] * [root(5) - 1] to 2*[root(5) - 1]
= 5 - 1 to 2*root(5) - 2
= 2 to root(5) - 1

It's harder to get an estimate now than it was in the original question, which is why it doesn't make much sense to use conjugates here. Still, even with a rough estimate of root(5) here, you can see that the answer should be somewhere between 3 to 2 and 2 to 1.
User avatar
benpack03
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Last visit: 31 Jan 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Posts: 80
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How about 13 to 8

root 5 aproximately equals 2.24, so 3.25 to 2 equals 13 to 8.......
User avatar
rashminet84
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Last visit: 20 Aug 2010
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 111
Kudos: 245
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
\sqrt{5} is almost equal to 2.2,
so 3.2 : 2 (multiply by 5 to get integers on both sides)
you get 16 : 10
or 8 : 5
User avatar
maliyeci
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Last visit: 04 Nov 2016
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Location: Turkey
Concentration: Finance and Accounting
Schools:UPenn, UMich, HKS, UCB, Chicago
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 200
Kudos: 250
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As integers increase, one can find a so near ratio. root 5 is something near 2,23. So equation comes near 1,62. One can say this 81/50. That is to say, something missing in question.
User avatar
parimal
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Last visit: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got 13/8 as well. took underroot of 5 and added 1 and then divided by 2 =325/200 = 13/8



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
109763 posts