Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
The macabre nature of Macbeth, together with the widespread belief that real-life tragedies have accompanied many productions, has made the name of the play so dreaded that not even the least superstitious members of mosts casts dare utter it.
(From the 2013 book, Kaplan has an idiom question, the answer for which I believe is incorrect (at least in common usage) and would like some clarification)
They give their answer as (A), it needs no correcting, when I believe it should have been corrected to:
...have made the name of the play...
Since, the clause in between the commas isn't merely a descriptive, or a modifier, but actually creates a plural subject, they. Similar to this:
He, together with she, have told you...
In this case, "together with" really is a slightly awkward substitution for "and", and thus makes it a plural subject. Had it been
He, as well as she, (creating an "or" of the subject)
The answer would be "He, as well as she, has told you"
"The macabre nature of Macbeth, not to mention the widespread belief..."
The subject would be singular, because the clause is subordinate.
Does this make sense, or am I incorrect?
If Kaplan is wrong, then it made a very big mistake with this question. Or, for the purposes of the GMAT, should I just assume that for the most part, clauses in parentheses are subordinate, and treat the subject as a singular noun.
Thanks for the help!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
In the 2013 book, Kaplan has an idiom question, the answer for which I believe is incorrect (at least in common usage) and would like some clarification:
The question reads:
The macabre nature of Macbeth, together with the widespread belief that real-life tragedies have accompanied many productions, has made the name of the play so dreaded that not even the least superstitious members of mosts casts dare utter it.
They give their answer as (A), it needs no correcting, when I believe it should have been corrected to:
...have made the name of the play...
Since, the clause in between the commas isn't merely a descriptive, or a modifier, but actually creates a plural subject, they. Similar to this:
He, together with she, have told you...
In this case, "together with" really is a slightly awkward substitution for "and", and thus makes it a plural subject. Had it been
He, as well as she, (creating an "or" of the subject)
The answer would be "He, as well as she, has told you"
"The macabre nature of Macbeth, not to mention the widespread belief..."
The subject would be singular, because the clause is subordinate.
Does this make sense, or am I incorrect?
If Kaplan is wrong, then it made a very big mistake with this question. Or, for the purposes of the GMAT, should I just assume that for the most part, clauses in parentheses are subordinate, and treat the subject as a singular noun.
Thanks for the help!
Show more
Nope, they are not wrong. 'together with' does not make a compound subject. And thus your sentence is as good as 'the macabre nature of macbeth has made.....'
Not sure about Kaplan book but I'd suggest you to refere to MGMAT SC guide book, which clearly explaines the concept of compound subjects and additive phrases.
Hope it helps.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.