Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is essential (defining) or non-essential (non-defining).
Let's take this example from MGMAT's SC book, pages 93 and 97, 12th edition: Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region whose most famous export is the wine that bears its name.
I am interested in the underlined relative clause that modifies region. Is this clause essential or non-essential?
This clause can be considered non-essential because... - because of the indefinite article "a" in "a French region". After all, the sentence could have said "the French region famous for its same=named wine". - because even without this modifier it is still clear, which French region is meant.
This clause can be considered essential because... - because there is no comma before whose. Do we need one? - because if we remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence changes. Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region. Now those people do not look that informed any more.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I am not always sure how to check if a relative clause is essential (defining) or non-essential (non-defining).
Let's take this example from MGMAT's SC book, pages 93 and 97, 12th edition: Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region whose most famous export is the wine that bears its name.
I am interested in the underlined relative clause that modifies region. Is this clause essential or non-essential?
This clause can be considered non-essential because... - because of the indefinite article "a" in "a French region". After all, the sentence could have said "the French region famous for its same=named wine". - because even without this modifier it is still clear, which French region is meant.
This clause can be considered essential because... - because there is no comma before whose. Do we need one? - because if we remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence changes. Well-informed people know that Bordeaux is a French region. Now those people do not look that informed any more.
Show more
Hi Sergey,
The modifier could be essential as well as non-essential. You should use the one based on the meaning that you want to express. You can identify whether a relative clause is non-essential by the use of comma. In the example that you have used the relative clause would be considered an essential one as it does not contain comma.
For example.
The person, who is standing next to the white car, is my brother.
No emphasis is given to the fact that the person is standing next to a white car. Probably there is just one person, so, in this case we do not intend to differentiate the person. The sentence could be read as "The person is my brother", the relative clause is non-essential.
The person who is standing next to the white car is my brother.
In this case the author/ or the writer intends to express information about a particular person. Which person? The person standing next to the white car. Probably there may be other people around or many cars around. Emphasis is given to the person and his state (standing next to a white car.)
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.