Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
1. The security guard WHOM we met was nice - RIGHT 2. The movie THAT we watched last friday was scary - WRONG 3. The movie we watched last friday was scary - RIGHT
The explanation given is this -
THAT or WHOM can be dropped when the modified noun is the object of the modifying clause.
The question is Why are we using WHOM in the first sentence then? Can we not drop it using the principle above?
Thanks in advance for replying.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
1. The security guard WHOM we met was nice - RIGHT 2. The movie THAT we watched last friday was scary - WRONG 3. The movie we watched last friday was scary - RIGHT
The explanation given is this -
THAT or WHOM can be dropped when the modified noun is the object of the modifying clause.
The question is Why are we using WHOM in the first sentence then? Can we not drop it using the principle above?
Thanks in advance for replying.
Show more
Hi,
I believe, the 2nd sentence is also correct. "The movie THAT we watched last friday was scary". It says that or whom can be dropped. It doesn't say it should be dropped.
Whom generally used as the object case pronoun. So it is required in the 1st sentence. We cannot drop it.
And both That and Whom are relative pronouns. And relative pronouns normally modifies the closed noun.
The below sentences, can be with or without "that". Either way is correct.
1. The movie THAT we watched last friday was scary. 2. The movie we watched last friday was scary .
1. The security guard WHOM we met was nice - RIGHT 2. The movie THAT we watched last friday was scary - WRONG 3. The movie we watched last friday was scary - RIGHT
The explanation given is this -
THAT or WHOM can be dropped when the modified noun is the object of the modifying clause.
The question is Why are we using WHOM in the first sentence then? Can we not drop it using the principle above?
Thanks in advance for replying.
Show more
Hey neasant, Could you please mention the corresponding page number of the Manhattan book?
Ideally the sentence that you have pointed out can be written both ways - Yes, the book is right in what it says.
The security guard WHOM we met was nice - RIGHT
The security guard we met was nice - RIGHT.
Take it this way; If you know what the relative pronoun is referring to in the sentence then you can actually drop the relative pronoun. However if the pronoun is ambiguous then it would be a problem if it is dropped.
Don't worry! Such differences are very rarely tested on the GMAT
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.