Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
I am currently reading Manhattan "Foundation of Verbal" and there is the following example: " Incorrect: Stuyvesant's math team beat Bronx Science." They then emphasise, that team needs to be matched with parallelism. For instance: "CORRECT: Stuyvesant's math team beat Bronx Science's math team." While I understand this, I am having doubts about the other part of the sentence: "team beat ...team" As I understand it team is a collective noun and should therefore always be treated as singular. Shouldn't it be "team beats ... team".
Thank you very much in advance.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
This is a past tense clause, in which one uses only' beat' for both forms of singular and plural nouns. A progressive tense is a better word in such a case, for denoting an on going action. (Team A is beating Team B.) News reporting such as --Brazil beats France and Argentina beats Germany --- are more notional and less formal
wow thanks, would have never guessed! and why is it simple past, there is no time information - is past participle also an option? Just asking out of curiousity!
We can use past participle 'had beaten' if there were two events, one fairly well before the other happening. But there is only one event, 'A beat B'. Therefore no use of past participle.
I am sorry, I used the wrong term, what I actually meant was the present perfect: so "has beaten". Thank you very much for your help!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.