Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
08 Jan 2008, 01:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
"The department of labor allows the fees of investment officers to be based on the performance of the funds they manage."
I came across this example from an ebook, which simply said that this sentence is considered correct because the pronoun "they" is clearly referring to the referent "officers." What I have done is underlined both "officers" and "fees" and would like to know how come the pronoun "they" is not considered ambiguous? because it could also refer to the plural noun "fees" or are we suppose to consider the LOGICAL referent? I'm confused because sometimes I read a book that says never to allow a pronoun have more than 1 possible referent, and then here, I see something else. Although I do agree that "officers" is a logical referent, but there are people who could get confused with the intended referent. Are we suppose to limit our pronouns to only 1 possible referent, or we could be flexible, but provided that we have a logical referent? Would anyone who have any solid idea share it with me and shed some lights? i'd really appreciate it. thanks
I came across this example from an ebook, which simply said that this sentence is considered correct because the pronoun "they" is clearly referring to the referent "officers." What I have done is underlined both "officers" and "fees" and would like to know how come the pronoun "they" is not considered ambiguous? because it could also refer to the plural noun "fees" or are we suppose to consider the LOGICAL referent? I'm confused because sometimes I read a book that says never to allow a pronoun have more than 1 possible referent, and then here, I see something else. Although I do agree that "officers" is a logical referent, but there are people who could get confused with the intended referent. Are we suppose to limit our pronouns to only 1 possible referent, or we could be flexible, but provided that we have a logical referent? Would anyone who have any solid idea share it with me and shed some lights? i'd really appreciate it. thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
507 posts
363 posts
