Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 10:41 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 10:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 618
Kudos: 2,186
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
reply2spg
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Last visit: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 270
Kudos: 4,615
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
priyankurml
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Last visit: 30 Jun 2012
Posts: 340
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 340
Kudos: 2,698
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sanjay_gmat
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Apr 2009
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Posts: 119
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
icandy
Editorial: The roof of Northtown Council’s equipment-storage building collapsed under
the weight of last week’s heavy snowfall. The building was constructed recently and met
local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching
roof supports to the building’s columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for
this purpose. Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently
insignificant, departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the editorial’s argument?
A. The only other buildings whose roofs collapsed from the weight of the snowfall
were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those
in the safety codes.
B. Because of the particular location of the equipment-storage building, the weight
of snow on its roof was greater than the maximum weight allowed for in the
safety codes.
C. Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation,
some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not
apply to it.
D. The columns of the building were no stronger than the building-safety codes
required for such a building.
E. Because the equipment-storage building was where the council kept snowremoval
equipment, the building was almost completely empty when the roof
collapsed.

D should be the right answer. If the column is made according to the specification, then it's the nail that is the cause of trouble.
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 618
Kudos: 2,186
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA given is A

No OE



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
512 posts
363 posts