Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Stuck at the same GMAT score? Plateaus aren’t about effort—they’re about approach. Watch Srikar’s journey to uncover what truly drives score improvement—and how you can apply it to break your plateau.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
66%
(02:20)
correct 34%
(02:27)
wrong
based on 207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Critics of strict "promotional gates" at the grade school level point to a recent study comparing students forced to repeat a grade with those promoted despite failing scores on an unscheduled, experimental competency test. Since there was no significant difference between the two groups' scores on a second test administered after completion of the next higher grade level, these critics argue that the retention policy has failed in its expressed purpose of improving students' basic skills.
Which of the following best expresses the argument made by critics of promotional gates?
(A) Anxiety over performance on standardized tests often hinders a student's ability to master challenging new material.
(B) A student's true intellectual development cannot be gauged by his score on a standardized competency test.
(C) The psychological damage a child suffers by repeat a grade outweighs the potential intellectual benefits of a second chance at learning.
(D) Strict requirements for promotion do not lead to harder work and greater mastery of fundamentals among students fearful of being held back.
(E) Socioeconomic factors as well as test scores influenced whether a given student in the study was promoted or forced to repeat a grade
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I misunderstood part of the stimulus and confused myself: "difference between the two groups' scores...". . . . . . I thought the one being promoted score no better than the one being held back on the second test he he. If I am wrong, anybody has the same problem or just me? Thanks.
Well the conclusion talks about " improving students' basic skills". So, we must look for the answers that discuss this issue (basic fundamentals/skills) along with retention/promotion policy. So, D.
I would consider it more of a 'find the conclusion'question. Here the main idea is: even though the students were retained and forced to repeat the grade, their performance was no better than those who were promoted: which implies that despite knowing and being fearful about the prospect of not being promoted does not encourage students to work harder, hence the strict promotional criteria is of little or no use.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.