When a polygraph test is judged inconclusive, this is no reflection on the examinee. Rather, such a judgment means that the test has failed to show whether the examinee was truthful or untruthful. Nevertheless, employers
will sometimes refuse to hire a job applicant because of an inconclusive polygraph test result.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?
(A) Most examinees with inconclusive polygraph test results are in fact untruthful.
(B)Polygraph tests should not be used by employers in the consideration of job applicants.
(C)An inconclusive polygraph test result is sometimes unfairly held against the examinee.
(D)A polygraph test indicating that an examinee is untruthful can sometimes be mistaken.
(E)Some employers have refused to consider the results of polygraph tests when evaluating job applicants.
Hi HongHu,
Why can it be A? I read the OG answer and still didn't get it. How does a unfairly held test prevent the employer from hiring the applicant? I can seem to figure that out.
I mean in OG:"treating lack of information as if it were unfavorable evidence about a person can reasonably be considered unfair". That's all true, but how does that connect to "refute to hire"? After all it's just a test that can't tell anything about the applicant.
Please help
Many thanks!
Your overthinking your answer. YOu have to think of Critical reasoning questions as an alien would who doesn't know anything except the information that it is given. It can't be A because we don't know if a inclusive test in the mind of the person hiring you means untrustfull.
wahi