Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Questions 4 and 5:
Roberts is accused of a crime and Edwards is the prosecution's key witness
I. Roberts can be convicted on the basis of Edwards' testimony against him
II. Edwards' testimony would show that Edwards himself participated in Roberts' wrongdoing
III. The crime of which Roberts is accused can only be committed by a person acting alone
IV. If the jury learns that Edwards himself committed some wrong, they will refuse to believe any part of his testimony
4. If propositions I, II and III are assumed to be true and IV false, which of the following best describes the outcome of the trial?
(A) Both Edwards and Roberts will be convicted of the crime of which Roberts is accused
(B) Both Edwards and Roberts will be convicted of other crime other than the one with which Roberts is already charged
(C) Roberts will be convicted while Edwards will not be convicted
(D) Roberts will not be convicted
(E) Roberts will testify against Edwards
5. If all four propositions are taken as a group, it can be pointed out that the scenario they describe is
(A) A typical situation for a prosecutor
(B) impossible because the propositions are logically inconsistent
(C) unfair to Edwards, who may have to incriminate himself
(D) unfair to Roberts, who may be convicted of the crime
(E) one which Roberts' attorney has created
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Roberts is accused of a crime and Edwards is the prosecution's key witness
I. Roberts can be convicted on the basis of Edwards' testimony against him II. Edwards' testimony would show that Edwards himself participated in Roberts' wrongdoing III. The crime of which Roberts is accused can only be committed by a person acting alone IV. If the jury learns that Edwards himself committed some wrong, they will refuse to believe any part of his testimony
4. If propositions I, II and III are assumed to be true and IV false, which of the following best describes the outcome of the trial?
(A) Both Edwards and Roberts will be convicted of the crime of which Roberts is accused (B) Both Edwards and Roberts will be convicted of other crime other than the one with which Roberts is already charged (C) Roberts will be convicted while Edwards will not be convicted (D) Roberts will not be convicted (E) Roberts will testify against Edwards
5. If all four propositions are taken as a group, it can be pointed out that the scenario they describe is (A) A typical situation for a prosecutor (B) impossible because the propositions are logically inconsistent (C) unfair to Edwards, who may have to incriminate himself (D) unfair to Roberts, who may be convicted of the crime (E) one which Roberts' attorney has created
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.