Last visit was: 15 May 2026, 20:29 It is currently 15 May 2026, 20:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Own Kudos:
Posts: 893
Kudos: 648
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatmba
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 515
Own Kudos:
Location: France
Posts: 515
Kudos: 115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
paddyboy
Joined: 06 May 2006
Last visit: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 387
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Posts: 706
Kudos: 960
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was looking for something that relates to weather
to tie the oil and gas together...
wow... that's a poem!

(A) Long-term weather forecasts predict a mild winter.
(B) the argument isn't about switching from one to the other... out of scope
(C) my 2nd choice, but if this is the case why are they mentioning approach of winter and "this year"... seems like this would be the general case every year.
(D) opposite is likely to be the case... since prices both depend on weather
(E) nope, they are the same... thus the price affect is the same

so b/w A and C, but prefer A as it seems to be less genera and applicable to specific "this" year
User avatar
deowl
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 Apr 2010
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Posts: 188
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B it is
User avatar
Futuristic
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 07 May 2009
Posts: 415
Own Kudos:
Posts: 415
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'd go with A. It directly presents a scenario which confirms one of the conditions for low prices of natural gas.
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bet B on this one.
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Own Kudos:
Posts: 893
Kudos: 648
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
bet B on this one.


Your bets on the right money.

It is B. I am sure a lot of people of would like to know how it is the right answer
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaynayak
Despite the approach of winter, oil prices to indus-
trial customers are exceptionally low this year and
likely to remain so. Therefore, unless the winter is
especially severe, the price of natural gas to indus-
trial customers is also likely to remain low.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most
support for the conclusion above?
(A) Long-term weather forecasts predict a mild winter.
(B) The industrial users who consume most natural
gas can quickly and cheaply switch to using
oil instead.


B talks about an aspect of economics that is subtitutional products. Herein, "natural gas" and "oil" are substitutes to one another.
Back to the argument. It says: if the winter is severe, the price of natural gas will increase. That is to say, once the winter is severe, the oil prices will increase --> this makes people shift to using natural gas --> once the demand increases, the price will increase provided that the supply is unchanged. But this argument needs a confirmation that there's no cost ( or low cost) involved for people to switch from oil to natural gas ---> this is exactly what B provides!

Anyways, i think this CR calls for some out-of-scope knowledge ;)
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 534
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
jaynayak
Despite the approach of winter, oil prices to indus-
trial customers are exceptionally low this year and
likely to remain so. Therefore, unless the winter is
especially severe, the price of natural gas to indus-
trial customers is also likely to remain low.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most
support for the conclusion above?
(A) Long-term weather forecasts predict a mild winter.
(B) The industrial users who consume most natural
gas can quickly and cheaply switch to using
oil instead.

B talks about an aspect of economics that is subtitutional products. Herein, "natural gas" and "oil" are substitutes to one another.
Back to the argument. It says: if the winter is severe, the price of natural gas will increase. That is to say, once the winter is severe, the oil prices will increase --> this makes people shift to using natural gas --> once the demand increases, the price will increase provided that the supply is unchanged. But this argument needs a confirmation that there's no cost ( or low cost) involved for people to switch from oil to natural gas ---> this is exactly what B provides!

Anyways, i think this CR calls for some out-of-scope knowledge ;)


agree with B and your explanation.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
570 posts
368 posts