Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Every time a business grants financial credit to an individual, the business assumes risk. In order to evaluate the risk, a business must have correct information about that individual’s financial history. It is true that credit bureaus, which compile such information from computerized records, have been accused of invading the consumer’s right to privacy. If, however, only limited restrictions are placed on the availability of such information to businesses, those businesses will be able to reduce their overall exposure to risk by giving credit only to people with good credit ratings while at the same time extending larger amounts of credit to more people. This way credit bureaus can, in fact, prevent the foolhardy consumer from becoming seriously overextended.
The author argues that any harm individual consumers suffer from the relatively free access of the business community to the information compiled by credit bureaus is
a. compensated by the benefits that free access provides to consumers in general
b. attributable to the reluctance of many businesses to increase their exposure to risk
c. unavoidable, because consumers must sacrifice some of their rights in exchange for credit
d. sufficient to justify the business community’s careful scrutiny of the data supplied by credit bureaus
e. negligible, in view of the business community’s need for accurate financial histories
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The Answer is ‘A’, what the author argues is that free access will help businesses grant higher credit to those who can afford it and more credit in general, thus benefiting the consumers overall. So the relatively free access to credit info is offset by this.
a. compensated by the benefits that free access provides to consumers in general
Implies that people with bad credit will be disallowed loans they should not take out; business will benefit the remaining consumers by providing them larger loans.
so harm is compensated by the fact that people with bad credit history get the loans, because the argument mentions restrictions, which cause the smaller number of loans with higher credit lines
A
I think B is actually going against the argument... because businesses are not reluctant to give out the credit to the people with bad credit
The author is careful to point out both benefits and harms of sharing information, but the jist of his statement is that is that by imposing some restrictions upon the information (implying that the harm will be also limited), the benefits outweight the harm.
B may be true but it is not the point of the author's argument. In addition, that harm is a secondary effect.
C is too strong. It says that "any" harm is unavoidable where the author implies that by imposing some restrictions on the use of personal information, that the harm will be mitigated to the point where the benefits outweigh the harm.
D is also too strong. The author concedes that there is potential for abuse.
E is also too strong. The author never states nor implies that any harm is "negligible".
The author's tone and his arguments are more inclined to prove that free access of information actually benefits the consumer. Specifically the last line nails down the answer.
This way credit bureaus can, in fact, prevent the foolhardy consumer from becoming seriously overextended.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.