Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
An engineer claims that solar cells for the generation of electrical power can never meet our high demand for electrical energy. He points out that such cells are made largely of silicon, and that silicon is extracted and refined by the use of electrical energy. He says that the amount of energy required to produce the silicon in a solar cell is greater than the energy that cell will produce during its useful working life.
The engineer's conclusion seems to depend on which of the following assumptions?
A) We will not continue to produce large amounts of electrical energy by burning fossil fuels.
B) Our overall need for electrical energy cannot be reduced.
C) We will not find more efficient ways of extracting and refining silicon.
D) Electrical energy, since it does not decay, can be recycled indefinitely.
E) It will soon become economically feasible to harness solar energy by other means, by heating water and using the water to power 'minimum gradient' engines.
please explain
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
It is the basic assumption that in the future also, for mass production of solar cells, the same economics hold good. That is, we will not find more efficient ways of extracting and refining silicon.
An engineer claims that solar cells for the generation of electrical power can never meet our high demand for electrical energy. He points out that such cells are made largely of silicon, and that silicon is extracted and refined by the use of electrical energy. He says that the amount of energy required to produce the silicon in a solar cell is greater than the energy that cell will produce during its useful working life.
The engineer's conclusion seems to depend on which of the following assumptions?
A) We will not continue to produce large amounts of electrical energy by burning fossil fuels. irrelevant.
B) Our overall need for electrical energy cannot be reduced.
even if it does reduce, doesnt mean that using silicon will be feasible.
C) We will not find more efficient ways of extracting and refining silicon.
[color=red]true. if you negate this the argument will fall apart D) Electrical energy, since it does not decay, can be recycled indefinitely.
so how does it matter to silicon use ?
E) It will soon become economically feasible to harness solar energy by other means, by heating water and using the water to power 'minimum gradient' engines.
Easy C.
the amount of energy required to produce the silicon in a solar cell is greater than the energy that cell will produce during its useful working life For this to be true we have to assume that
We will not find more efficient ways of extracting and refining silicon
The engineer obviously assumes that there is no better way now nerither there will be in the future, hence comes to an extreme conclusion that solar cells will never be able to fulfill our power needs.
C is the answear rely on the assumption that other ways of getting energy will not be found,.... E seems to go against the conclusion because describe alternative ways and A, B and D are out of scope
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.