Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Stuck at the same GMAT score? Plateaus aren’t about effort—they’re about approach. Watch Srikar’s journey to uncover what truly drives score improvement—and how you can apply it to break your plateau.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(01:17)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until their findings are published in peer-reviewed journals before informing the press of important research results. This is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health, but the peer-review process is unavoidably very slow. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research. (B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press. (C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information. (D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals. (E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new medical discoveries if medical researchers abandon their practice of waiting until their findings are published in peer-reviewed journals before informing the press of important research results. This is because the public release of new medical information allows people to use that information in order to improve their health, but the peer-review process is unavoidably very slow. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Peer review often prevents the publication of false conclusions drawn on the basis of poorly conducted medical research. (B) People often alter their life-styles on the basis of new medical information made available through the press. (C) Some improvements in public health are due to factors other than the discovery of new medical information. (D) Some newspapers would be willing to publish the results of medical research before those results have appeared in peer-reviewed journals. (E) Most peer-reviewed scientific journals would refuse to give up the practice of peer review.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.