Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1001:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Stuck at the same GMAT score? Plateaus aren’t about effort—they’re about approach. Watch Srikar’s journey to uncover what truly drives score improvement—and how you can apply it to break your plateau.
May 1312:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
May 1506:00 PM PDT
-07:00 PM PDT
Start your free trial!
25 Feb 2025, 09:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39% (01:41) correct
61%
(01:24)
wrong
based on 107
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A recent study found that cities with extensive bike lane networks tend to have lower levels of traffic congestion compared to cities with fewer bike lanes. Based on this, a city planner argues that expanding bike lanes in a congested city will necessarily lead to a significant reduction in traffic congestion.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city planner’s argument?
(A) Many cities with extensive bike lane networks also have strong public transportation systems that contribute to reduced congestion.
(B) Expanding bike lanes requires reducing the number of lanes available for cars, which could initially increase congestion.
(C) A survey found that only a small percentage of residents in congested cities are willing to switch from cars to bicycles for their daily commute.
(D) In some cities, bike lanes are underutilized because of weather conditions and terrain, leading to no measurable impact on congestion.
(E) The cost of expanding bike lane networks varies widely depending on the city's existing infrastructure.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city planner’s argument?
(A) Many cities with extensive bike lane networks also have strong public transportation systems that contribute to reduced congestion.
(B) Expanding bike lanes requires reducing the number of lanes available for cars, which could initially increase congestion.
(C) A survey found that only a small percentage of residents in congested cities are willing to switch from cars to bicycles for their daily commute.
(D) In some cities, bike lanes are underutilized because of weather conditions and terrain, leading to no measurable impact on congestion.
(E) The cost of expanding bike lane networks varies widely depending on the city's existing infrastructure.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
25 Feb 2025, 09:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
Can someone please explain to me how or why the answer is C?
A looks like the best answer as C is making an assumption that the congestion is caused by cars which the passage never mentioned.
A looks like the best answer as C is making an assumption that the congestion is caused by cars which the passage never mentioned.
26 Feb 2025, 14:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
I assume you chose A. If you're wondering why A is incorrect, consider this: What if people show a strong preference for switching from cars rather than bikes? In that case, the number of cars would decrease, reducing congestion and freeing up road space. However, if people are not interested in switching from cars in the first place, the plan would fail. That's why the correct answer is C
Success2003
