Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0701:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
May 0808:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
May 0808:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
06 Jun 2025, 09:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
75% (01:43) correct
25%
(01:54)
wrong
based on 103
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Dr Costello believes chatbots work where humans fail because they offer rational responses instead of letting emotions get the better of them. Furthermore, chatbots can comb through their extensive training data to offer precise counter-arguments, unlike humans who often use generalised ones.
If Dr Costello's claims are true, which of the following must also be true?
A) Humans are inherently incapable of delivering precise counter-arguments under any circumstances.
B) Chatbots will always succeed in changing beliefs when they provide rational, precise counter-arguments.
C) If humans were able to consistently maintain rationality without emotional interference in debates, they would be more effective in debunking disinformation than is currently the case.
D) The ability to provide precise counter-arguments is the primary reason for the failure of chatbots as well.
E) Generalised counter-arguments are more effective against certain types of disinformation than precise counter-arguments.
A) This is too extreme: the stimulus says humans often use generalised arguments, not that they are incapable of precision.
B) The stimulus reports results but doesn't claim chatbots always succeed; it says they work where humans fail.
C) Correct: If humans overcame the emotional aspect, which is cited as a key failing point, their effectiveness should improve.
D) The text attributes chatbots' success partly to precision; it implies precision helps rather than causes failure.
E) The stimulus suggests chatbots' precision is better, implying generalised arguments are less effective.
The argument notes that humans fail partly due to emotional interference. If that flaw were fixed, logic dictates their effectiveness should increase relative to the current state. Option C covers both cited advantages: rationality and precision. Other options state conclusions that either go beyond the stimulus (A, B, D) or directly contradict it (E).
If Dr Costello's claims are true, which of the following must also be true?
A) Humans are inherently incapable of delivering precise counter-arguments under any circumstances.
B) Chatbots will always succeed in changing beliefs when they provide rational, precise counter-arguments.
C) If humans were able to consistently maintain rationality without emotional interference in debates, they would be more effective in debunking disinformation than is currently the case.
D) The ability to provide precise counter-arguments is the primary reason for the failure of chatbots as well.
E) Generalised counter-arguments are more effective against certain types of disinformation than precise counter-arguments.
Show SpoilerHints
Identify what Dr Costello identifies as humans' core problem (emotional interference) and consider how addressing it might affect their performance.
Show SpoilerExplanations
A) This is too extreme: the stimulus says humans often use generalised arguments, not that they are incapable of precision.
B) The stimulus reports results but doesn't claim chatbots always succeed; it says they work where humans fail.
C) Correct: If humans overcame the emotional aspect, which is cited as a key failing point, their effectiveness should improve.
D) The text attributes chatbots' success partly to precision; it implies precision helps rather than causes failure.
E) The stimulus suggests chatbots' precision is better, implying generalised arguments are less effective.
The argument notes that humans fail partly due to emotional interference. If that flaw were fixed, logic dictates their effectiveness should increase relative to the current state. Option C covers both cited advantages: rationality and precision. Other options state conclusions that either go beyond the stimulus (A, B, D) or directly contradict it (E).
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
08 Jun 2025, 21:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi, what is the reason for option C to be the answer?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
