Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
please compare the following two questions, I thinks it is a little controversial.
question1: According to a government study, the lush swamps and marshes of the Mississippi delta, among the finest wetlands in the world, are vanishing at a rate of 39 square miles a year, as fast as two and a half times the rate that was previously thought.
(A) as fast as two and a half times the rate that was
(B)two and a half times as fast as it had been
(C)two and a half times faster than
(D)a rate two and a half times as fast as
(E)which is a rate two and a half times faster than had been
question2 For several years, companies in the United States have increased spending for research far faster than the inflation rate.
(A)far faster than the inflation rate
(B)exceeding by far the rate of inflation
(C)far faster than rising inflation
(D)far faster than the rising of the inflation rate
(E)at a rate far exceeding the rate of inflation
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I think I understand what you mean by the similarity in the questions. 'rate' is removed from repeat use in 1 and 'rate' forced in the sentence in 2. IMO That's what would be right in their respective context.
I think I understand what you mean by the similarity in the questions. 'rate' is removed from repeat use in 1 and 'rate' forced in the sentence in 2. IMO That's what would be right in their respective context.
Show more
Hi, can you explain why in question2 "rate" is needed ?
I still cannot beleive answer choice for question1 is C, where they compare rate and thought. Also, it says "times faster" which is not correct.
What is the source of these questions and do you have an OE?
I do have an explanation if the answer choices are question1: B and question2: E.
question1:
...are vanishing at a rate [of 39/yr], *** two and a half times as fast as it had been...
If you notice the sentence after ignoring the preosition, there is a rate already and we dont need to add another rate in *** on the same side (left hand side).
As for the right hand side of comparision "it" stands for the rate and hence we are okay.
question2:
have increased spending for research *** far faster than the inflation rate
This sentence has a rate on the RHS. But for LHS it is a spending and we need to have a rate to compare apples to apples.
Adding a rate in the *** makes it balanced.
I remember a great post from vithal where he explained how to use times -fold, more ...
Q1 : C as OA is weird... Theory finding is B or D
B : it is awkward
D : no verb in the final subsentence (btw is it right that this is a killer concern ?)
Q2 : Agree with E and //ism (What are LHS et RHS ?)
I remember a great post from vithal where he explained how to use times -fold, more ...
Q1 : C as OA is weird... Theory finding is B or D B : it is awkward D : no verb in the final subsentence (btw is it right that this is a killer concern ?)
Q2 : Agree with E and //ism (What are LHS et RHS ?)
According to a government study, the lush swamps and marshes of the Mississippi delta, among the finest wetlands in the world, are vanishing at a rate of 39 square miles a year, as fast as two and a half times the rate that was previously thought.
(A) as fast as two and a half times the rate that was
(B)two and a half times as fast as it had been
(C)two and a half times faster than
(D)a rate two and a half times as fast as
(E)which is a rate two and a half times faster than had been
I think C shd be the right answer to this question.
I picked C as the best answer to 1) but I am a bit disturbed by this answer.
Read the original prompt carefully- it appears that 39 miles^2 per year is 2.5 times the predicted rate. Thus 2.5x = 39, x = 15.6.
Now read C carefully- it appears that C states that 39 miles^2 per year is x + 2.5x (the predicted rate + 2.5 time the predicted rate), thus 3.5 x = 39, x = 11.1
This changes the meaning of the sentence and thus should not be the answer to a properly validated test question.
My approach for either of the sentences were like this..
1. '....lush swamps....are vanishing at a rate......,......faster than previously thought'.
Read the above as though thats all the sentence is made up of. Does it sound right and square? Sure does. Lets look for addl info now. How much faster? two-and-a-half times. Lets plug that answer after the comma. We then have
'....lush swamps....are vanishing at a rate......,two and a half times faster than previously thought'.
2. Same approach for question2.
'.....United States have increased spending for research....faster than....inflation'
Does it sound ok? No. If I simply add, at a rate faster than rate of inflation. Will it sound good? Sure does. Lets plug in
'.....United States have increased spending for research at a rate faster than rate of inflation'.
The sentence is also grammatically fine - parallelism, comparison all fine.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.