Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50%
(01:06)
correct 50%
(01:08)
wrong
based on 31
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A decade after initiating the nation’s most comprehensive and aggressive anti-smoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole. A. … B. Annual per capita consumption of cigarette4s in California declined from over 125 to about 60, more than twice as great as that C. California’s annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop D. California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that E. California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that
I chose E for this one. I was between E and D. I have an idea of what went wrong but I need to get a clear picture of why I made this mistake. Please tell me your answers and tell me how you came to those answers. Thanks!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A decade after initiating the nation’s most comprehensive and aggressive anti-smoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole. A. … B. Annual per capita consumption of cigarette4s in California declined from over 125 to about 60, more than twice as great as that C. California’s annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop D. California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that E. California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that
I chose E for this one. I was between E and D. I have an idea of what went wrong but I need to get a clear picture of why I made this mistake. Please tell me your answers and tell me how you came to those answers. Thanks!
Show more
Hi!
(E) has two major problems. First, it contains "per capita... per person". Since per capita and per person mean the same thing, E is redundant.
Second, (E) is missing the essential phrase "a drop" in the last part. Without "a drop", it's unclear what the last phrase is modifying. If we read (E) literally, the last phrase is saying that "about 60" is twice as great as that in the nation, which is nonsensical.
Since A, B and C all begin with modification errors (we need to start with "California", which is what the introductory phrase is describing), only D remains - choose D!
A decade after initiating the nation’s most comprehensive and aggressive anti-smoking program, per capita consumption of cigarettes in California declined from over 125 packs annually per person to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as in the nation as a whole. A. … B. Annual per capita consumption of cigarette4s in California declined from over 125 to about 60, more than twice as great as that C. California’s annual per capita consumption of cigarettes declined from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as the drop D. California has seen per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs annually to about 60, a drop more than twice as great as that E. California has seen annual per capita consumption of cigarettes decline from over 125 packs per person to about 60, more than twice as great as that
I chose E for this one. I was between E and D. I have an idea of what went wrong but I need to get a clear picture of why I made this mistake. Please tell me your answers and tell me how you came to those answers. Thanks!
Hi!
(E) has two major problems. First, it contains "per capita... per person". Since per capita and per person mean the same thing, E is redundant.
Second, (E) is missing the essential phrase "a drop" in the last part. Without "a drop", it's unclear what the last phrase is modifying. If we read (E) literally, the last phrase is saying that "about 60" is twice as great as that in the nation, which is nonsensical.
Since A, B and C all begin with modification errors (we need to start with "California", which is what the introductory phrase is describing), only D remains - choose D!
Show more
The OA is D. Thank you Skovinsky!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.