Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 12:17 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 12:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,290
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
complicated
Joined: 15 May 2005
Last visit: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
krisrini
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Last visit: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
Location: India, Chennai
Posts: 155
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yes, my choice is D coz "he" modifies " the soldier" .
User avatar
desiguy
Joined: 11 May 2004
Last visit: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 275
Own Kudos:
Location: New York
Posts: 275
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Go with D.

Eliminate A, B and C for wrong reference.

Between D and E, I chose D because the extra "had" is not necessary

GMATT73
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims not to have committed, the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing.


(A) the soldier`s lawyer vehemently denied that the young man had any part in the wrongdoing
(B) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
(C) the lawyer retained by the soldier vehemently denied that the young man has had any part in the wrongdoing
(D) the soldier vehemently denied that he had any part in the wrongdoing
(E) the soldier vehemently denied that he had had any part in the wrongdoing
User avatar
celiaXDN
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Last visit: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Location: New York
Posts: 90
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
complicated
I think subject is solder so left D and E.
I vote for E because it uses "had had" (the action that happed before he denied)


I am comfused over the same issue. What is the OA? :?
User avatar
cdaat
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Last visit: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Posts: 21
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i would stick with A

all the sentences modify the lawyer who was brought in the court.
User avatar
rahuluec
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 91
Kudos: 425
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would go for D. Whu had had in E? What does it mean? Please explain...
User avatar
duttsit
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Kudos: 708
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E.

"had had" is past perfect. Used if we need to point to an event Before some other event in the past.

A,B,C streight out. We should not attribute crime to lawyer :)
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need the noun 'soldier' to come first. So we need to consider D or E>

Between the two, E is a better choice. We need the past perfect form 'had had' to imply that the soldier has nothing to do with the wrongdoing. The first 'had' is for the for past tense nature of the sentence (solider brought before...) and the second 'had' is even further back behind the timeline as the wrongdoing occured before the trial.

E is the best choice.
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,575
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,575
Kudos: 687
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is OK. I think simple past would do...we are not differentiating between two events..at least i dont see the logic of the two events..

brought before W, the solider denied that he had anything to do with XYZ, is fine...
User avatar
nakib77
Joined: 28 May 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 984
Own Kudos:
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 984
Kudos: 3,714
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will choose E.
Firstly, it uses correct modifier and secondly it uses correct past perfect tense.
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"denied that" here start an indirect speech.
Imagine we were in that court and heard the soldier's direct denying, he would say this way " I have no part in the wrongdoing" :!: . Of coz, he would use present tense here to describe a fact . If he had denied " I had no part in the wrongdoing" , it would have meant that he, at the time at the court, had a part in wrongdoing. Anyway, it's only my opinion :roll:
User avatar
HIMALAYA
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 796
Own Kudos:
Posts: 796
Kudos: 270
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E. i think we need PP tense to express an event that happenbed earlier than the later one in a sequence of events.
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,290
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is E.

Explanation:
Spot the Error:
The descriptive phrase, "brought before...committed", indicates the modifier is being tested.

Rule and Fix:
A Modifier must be as close as possible to the thing it describes, in this case the phrase should modify the solider not the lawyer.

POE:
A, B, and C all place the lawyer directly after the phrase causing the phrase to modify the lawyer.

Chunk and Compare:
Compare D to E.
The difference is in the verbs. D uses the simple past (had) while E uses the Past Perfect (had had). Since there are 2 past events in the sentence that must be ordered (brought before the tribunal and denying) the past perfect is most appropiate.

Reread your choice:
Choose E.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts