Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 07:34 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 07:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,867
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,867
Kudos: 1,728
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
stolyar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Last visit: 06 May 2014
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 1,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mbamantra
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Last visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
Location: sydney
Posts: 170
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A noun becomes a compound noun when it combines with another noun using the conjunction ‘and’ and is plural in number per se.

For example: There is a brother and a sister in this class, is wrong because, a sister and a brother put together becomes a compound and plural noun entailing a plural verb. The correct version is ‘There are a sister and a brother in this class.’ Hence You can dump A and D.
B is the correct one; here ‘that’ is the subject of the subordinate clause; ‘that’ stands for both the laws and the word ‘each’ indicates that the laws individually and jointly are valid and consistent.

C is wrong because of using the unidiomatic ‘both of which are each’. Each is an unnecessary intrusion

E is wrong becos of saying that the laws are each valid ‘or’ consistent. Valid ‘or’ consistent distorts the intended meaning of the original passage.
User avatar
tirupatibalaji
Joined: 21 May 2010
Last visit: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Status:Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Location: London
Concentration: finance
Schools:INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years
Posts: 87
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
it becomes plural verb as two nouns are combined using the conjunction '‘and’' .
User avatar
mbasp
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="Praetorian"]The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

a. is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
b.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
c.are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
d. is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
e.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid or

IMO, B is the answer



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
498 posts
358 posts