Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 17:36 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 17:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
helpmeongmat
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Last visit: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Posts: 114
Kudos: 870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
empty_spaces
Joined: 13 May 2007
Last visit: 31 Jul 2013
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
227
 [1]
Posts: 127
Kudos: 227
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dellin
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Last visit: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bmwhype2
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1,333
Own Kudos:
5,552
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,333
Kudos: 5,552
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dellin
is it because when we omit "with two digit..." the sentence is right?
no

that is a restrictive modifier.

with double-digit unemployment, could severely strain a society that regards lifetime employment as a virtual right of citizenship. is a subordinated clause.

with double-digit unemployment, is an intro prepositional phrase

so basically what u have is independent clause + that + subordinated clause
where the subordinated clause is made a little more complex with an intro prepositional phrase
User avatar
JuliaS
Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Last visit: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
112
 [1]
Posts: 11
Kudos: 112
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Still don't understand why B is wrong. Can someone please explain? Thanks!
User avatar
LM
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Last visit: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 444
Own Kudos:
7,888
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 444
Kudos: 7,888
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll go with the meaning conveyed by the sentence.

Sentence conveys ;

Japan is in danger of plunging into a depression that could severely strain a society that regards lifetime employment as a virtual right of citizenship.

This is the basic essence of the sentence.

To add to the "danger of plunging into depression" is the the " double digit unemployment"

So what could severely strain a society is the "danger of plunging into depression" along with the " double digit unemployment".

C,D,E are eliminated because meaning of sentence changes which seems to imply that " Japan is plunging with double digit".

Now we are left with A and B.

But B seems to say that Japan is plunging into depression "because of" double digit unemployment, but that's not what the original sentence wants to convey.

So, you are left with "A".

I am not good in in depth grammatical terminology, but this is how I approached this.
User avatar
anirudhoswal
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Last visit: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Schools:Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Posts: 47
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Classic case of "eliminate the middleman" !! Remove the intervening phrase - with double digit unemplyment - and then answer A becomes clear.
User avatar
rahulgoyal1986
Joined: 27 May 2008
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Posts: 34
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A :-D
User avatar
raconteur
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Last visit: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B for me.

It really comes down between A and B.

"That" is a restrictive modifier like BMW said. However, in A, it makes it sound that the depression itself has double-digit unemployment. In B, the "that, because of double-digit unemployment, could..." does a good job of modifying the depression PLUS the fact of double-digit unemployment, will put a strain on society.

I think the key is to separate the depression and unemployment clearly. BECAUSE of the double-digit unemployment, the depression's impact on society will be especially big. The main point of the passage is about the depression's impact on society. B shows/adds strength to WHY the depression's impact will be significant.
User avatar
lionheart187
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Posts: 54
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, I also felt that A says that the depression has double digit unemployment . What is the source of this question?

Also, are these questions, with very ambiguous answer choices, going to appear on the real test? <- no joke intended;)
User avatar
marshpa
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 144
Kudos: 848
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also choose A and used following logic to delete B-
B uses severe, which is adjective to modify the strain which is another adjective. Hence wrong.

How is this approach?
User avatar
raconteur
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Last visit: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
marshpa
I also choose A and used following logic to delete B-
B uses severe, which is adjective to modify the strain which is another adjective. Hence wrong.

How is this approach?

In this context, "strain" is a noun like "challenge",etc. In A, "strain" acts as a verb so there is a difference on how these two options use "strain". But "could be a severe strain for...." is grammatically fine.
User avatar
prasannar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Last visit: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 352
Own Kudos:
Posts: 352
Kudos: 4,073
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A is the best for me.

B is wordy and also severe strain for a society does not sound right to me, it is definitely wordy

that, because of double-digit unemployment, could be a severe strain for



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts