Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0210:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Probability is one of the most important GMAT Quant topics because it often combines logic, counting, set theory, and permutations & combinations. Many students try to solve probability questions by listing every possible case, but GMAT probability...
Jun 0312:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.- Jun 03
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line 
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Jun 0401:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.- Jun 04
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare. 
Jun 0803:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
15 Full-length GMAT FE mocks with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
31 May 2026, 05:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Strengthens: When the option to pause a commercial-free television program is available, the vast majority of people will do so at least once during a program.
Weakens: People shown to have especially long attention spans are no more likely to enjoy commercial-free television programs than are people with short attention spans.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
24% (02:11) correct
76%
(02:13)
wrong
based on 49
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The results of a large study suggest that television viewers enjoy shows with commercials more than those without them. Test subjects who viewed an episode of a television series with commercials rated it more enjoyable than did subjects who viewed the same episode commercial-free. The study’s researchers concluded that a viewer’s enjoyment of a program depends a great deal on how well one can maintain attention, reasoning that commercial breaks enable viewers to reset their attention.
In the columns, select the statement that, if true, would most strengthen the argument and the statement that, if true, would most weaken the argument. Make only two selections, one in each column.
In the columns, select the statement that, if true, would most strengthen the argument and the statement that, if true, would most weaken the argument. Make only two selections, one in each column.
| Strengthens | Weakens | |
| Television programs tend to hold viewers’ attention better when they have shorter commercial breaks. | ||
| Television programs with commercial breaks have often been edited to allow time for the insertion of the breaks. | ||
| When the option to pause a commercial-free television program is available, the vast majority of people will do so at least once during a program. | ||
| People shown to have especially long attention spans are no more likely to enjoy commercial-free television programs than are people with short attention spans. | ||
| Commercial-free television programming tends to be of lower production quality than that shown with commercials. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Strengthens: When the option to pause a commercial-free television program is available, the vast majority of people will do so at least once during a program.
Weakens: People shown to have especially long attention spans are no more likely to enjoy commercial-free television programs than are people with short attention spans.
If this question felt shaky,
try an adaptive mini quiz of similar problems in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →. Free plan gives 5 questions per day.
31 May 2026, 05:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer Explanation (Official):
Evaluate :
Based on the study’s results and an assumption that commercial breaks enable viewers to reset their attention, the researchers argued that viewers’ enjoyment of a program depends largely on how well the viewers can maintain attention. A finding that most people pause commercial-free television programs when given the option might suggest that people like to take breaks from viewing to reset their attention, in order to enjoy the programs more. Thus, this finding would strengthen the argument.
On the other hand, a finding that people with especially long attention spans don’t enjoy commercial-free television programs any more than people with shorter attention spans do would conflict with the researchers’ hypothesis that enjoyment of a program depends on how well one can maintain attention during it. Therefore, this finding would weaken the argument.
Strengthens:
The correct answer is When the option to pause a commercial-free television program is available, the vast majority of people will do so at least once during a program.
Weakens:
The correct answer is People shown to have especially long attention spans are no more likely to enjoy commercial-free television programs than are people with short attention spans.
Evaluate :
Based on the study’s results and an assumption that commercial breaks enable viewers to reset their attention, the researchers argued that viewers’ enjoyment of a program depends largely on how well the viewers can maintain attention. A finding that most people pause commercial-free television programs when given the option might suggest that people like to take breaks from viewing to reset their attention, in order to enjoy the programs more. Thus, this finding would strengthen the argument.
On the other hand, a finding that people with especially long attention spans don’t enjoy commercial-free television programs any more than people with shorter attention spans do would conflict with the researchers’ hypothesis that enjoyment of a program depends on how well one can maintain attention during it. Therefore, this finding would weaken the argument.
Strengthens:
The correct answer is When the option to pause a commercial-free television program is available, the vast majority of people will do so at least once during a program.
Weakens:
The correct answer is People shown to have especially long attention spans are no more likely to enjoy commercial-free television programs than are people with short attention spans.
31 May 2026, 06:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
Solid Two-Part Analysis question, and the weaken option is the one that trips people up here.
The argument structure: commercial breaks help viewers reset their attention, and that's why shows with commercials are enjoyed more. The whole argument rests on the assumption that enjoyment depends on how well you can maintain attention.
For the strengthen column, you're looking for evidence that directly supports the mechanism (attention-resetting).
Option 3 (pause option): If most people voluntarily pause commercial-free programs when given the chance, that's strong behavioral evidence that viewers do in fact seek out those attention-resetting breaks. It's not just that they tolerate commercials — they're actively recreating the same function when it's absent. This directly supports the "attention reset" explanation. Strengthens.
For the weaken column, you want something that challenges the core assumption that attention maintenance drives enjoyment.
Option 4 (long attention spans): This one requires careful reading. The argument hinges on attention affecting enjoyment. If people with long attention spans — who by definition have less need to reset attention — enjoy commercial-free programs no more than people with short spans, that's a problem for the argument. It implies attention span isn't what's driving enjoyment differences, which undercuts the whole mechanism. Weakens.
The options that trip people:
Option 1 (shorter commercial breaks work better): This could seem like it weakens, but it's actually consistent with the mechanism — shorter breaks can still reset attention, just less efficiently. Doesn't clearly weaken.
Option 5 (lower production quality): This seems like a clean alternative explanation (commercial-free shows just aren't as good), but the question is asking about the argument that attention-resetting is the key factor. Option 4 does more direct damage to the underlying mechanism.
Answer: Strengthens = Option 3, Weakens = Option 4.
The argument structure: commercial breaks help viewers reset their attention, and that's why shows with commercials are enjoyed more. The whole argument rests on the assumption that enjoyment depends on how well you can maintain attention.
For the strengthen column, you're looking for evidence that directly supports the mechanism (attention-resetting).
Option 3 (pause option): If most people voluntarily pause commercial-free programs when given the chance, that's strong behavioral evidence that viewers do in fact seek out those attention-resetting breaks. It's not just that they tolerate commercials — they're actively recreating the same function when it's absent. This directly supports the "attention reset" explanation. Strengthens.
For the weaken column, you want something that challenges the core assumption that attention maintenance drives enjoyment.
Option 4 (long attention spans): This one requires careful reading. The argument hinges on attention affecting enjoyment. If people with long attention spans — who by definition have less need to reset attention — enjoy commercial-free programs no more than people with short spans, that's a problem for the argument. It implies attention span isn't what's driving enjoyment differences, which undercuts the whole mechanism. Weakens.
The options that trip people:
Option 1 (shorter commercial breaks work better): This could seem like it weakens, but it's actually consistent with the mechanism — shorter breaks can still reset attention, just less efficiently. Doesn't clearly weaken.
Option 5 (lower production quality): This seems like a clean alternative explanation (commercial-free shows just aren't as good), but the question is asking about the argument that attention-resetting is the key factor. Option 4 does more direct damage to the underlying mechanism.
Answer: Strengthens = Option 3, Weakens = Option 4.
