Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 23:24 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 23:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Amity007
Joined: 12 Sep 2025
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
355
 [4]
Given Kudos: 999
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Products:
Schools: ISB
Posts: 202
Kudos: 355
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Amity007
Joined: 12 Sep 2025
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 999
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Products:
Schools: ISB
Posts: 202
Kudos: 355
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Edskore
Joined: 29 Dec 2022
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 296
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,435
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's walk through all three statements using the table data.

Statement 1 (Yes): Between 2007 and 2011, shale gas grew from 1.5 to 7.85 million MMcf — an increase of 6.35, or roughly a 423% jump. Now compare every other method over the same period:
- Non-associated onshore: 5.003.58 (declined)
- Associated with oil: 1.952.08 (barely changed)
- Coal bed methane: 1.781.71 (declined)
- Non-associated offshore: 2.371.58 (declined)
- Alaska: 0.410.35 (declined)
- Tight gas: 6.265.86 (declined)

Shale gas clearly made the most significant strides. Answer: Yes

Statement 2 (No): We need years where BOTH non-associated onshore is below 3.0 AND tight gas is below 6.5. Scanning the table:
- 2020: onshore = 2.97 (below 3) and tight gas = 6.40 (below 6.5) → qualifies
- 2021: onshore = 2.90 and tight gas = 6.44 → qualifies
- 2022: onshore = 2.85 and tight gas = 6.49 → qualifies
- 2023: onshore = 2.77 but tight gas = 6.54 → does NOT qualify (6.54 is not below 6.5)

So the qualifying years are 2020, 2021, and 2022. Alaska extraction in those years: 0.28, 0.27, 0.27. These are NOT all the same0.28 differs from 0.27. Answer: No

Statement 3 (No): First, find the five years with the highest total production:
1. 2023: 27.75
2. 2022: 27.39
3. 2021: 26.94
4. 2020: 26.61
5. 2019: 26.31

The statement claims that NO method hit its all-time highest production in any of these five years. But look at shale gas — its all-time peak is 12.18 in 2023, which IS one of these five years. Similarly, tight gas peaks at 6.54 in 2023. So the claim is false — at least two methods achieved their ever-highest production during these top-5 years. Answer: No
Moderators:
Math Expert
109921 posts
498 posts
212 posts