Hi rshah13.
Your situation is interesting, as it sounds as if you have a decent grasp of what it takes to score high on the GMAT and yet didn't match your practice test scores when you took the actual GMAT.
I guess there are a few questions to answer here.
Why didn't you score close to where you have been scoring on practice tests?
To what degree does that score reflect your current skill levels?
How should you proceed going forward?
The answer to the first question is likely some combination of careless errors, your happening to see some questions that matched some skill gaps that you had, and your getting tricked by trap answers and new twists in verbal.
My best guess answer to the second question is that your skill levels are higher than that score indicates they are and that, at the same time, there are some gaps in your skillset.
Of course, without my seeing your ESR, it's a little tough for me to say exactly how to proceed. At the same time, I can say the following.
For quant, you could lock in a higher score by filling in skill gaps. You may get some information on where skill gaps lie from the ESR for this test. You may know where some lie. Clearly, permutations and geometry seem to be areas you could work on. Also, you can identify some by going over your previous practice questions and tests. Wherever they are, strengthen weaker areas, so that, if you see questions of those types on the test, you answer them within two minutes and get them correct. You don't have to become a master of every area, but the more areas you master, the more likely you will be to hit your score goal.
Also, if you think you may have made some careless errors in quant, focus on accuracy in your practice. Seek to get long streaks of correct answers in your practice. It's one thing to know basically how to answer quant questions and another to correctly answer them consistently.
For some tips on quant accuracy, you could check out this post:
https://blog.targettestprep.com/be-accu ... mat-score/Regarding verbal, what you have done so far sounds great. At the same time, somehow you chose trap answers when you took the actual test. So, you have to continue to train in verbal and become even better at defining exactly why wrong answers are wrong and right answers are right. GMAT verbal is essentially a test of the level of sophistication of the thinking that one brings to bear when answering the questions. So, seek to make your reasons for choosing answers even more sophisticated.
For some ideas on how to think about SC, consider the following choices and explanations.
In 1988,
the debut at the Metropolitan Opera of operatic singer Carlos Feller was made as Don Alfonso, regarded as his signature role, and returned there in 1990 as Dr. Bartolo in Rossini's Il Barbiere di Siviglia.
(A) the debut at the Metropolitan Opera of operatic singer Carlos Feller was made as Don Alfonso, regarded as his signature role, and returned
(B) operatic singer Carlos Feller made his debut at the Metropolitan Opera, in what was regarded as his signature role, Don Alfonso, and he returned
Explanation:(A)
Incorrect. The passive voice wording “the debut … was made” is suboptimal, as it places the focus of the sentence on the debut rather than on Carlos Feller, while Carlos Feller seems to be meant to be the main topic of the sentence, given what the sentence says about the debut, the role, and his returning in 1990.
Also, the wording “the debut … was made as Don Alfonso” does not clearly convey that Carlos Feller was in the role of Don Alfonso, instead conveying the nonsensical meaning that the debut itself somehow “was made as Don Alfonso.”
Also, since the past participial phrase “regarded as his signature role” is separated from the clause that precedes it by a comma, the phrase’s logical target is the subject of the preceding clause, and thus, the sentence seems to convey that Carlos Feller’s debut was regarded as his signature role.
Also, “the debut … was made … and returned” conveys the nonsensical meaning that the debut returned in 1990.
Also, since the sentence opens with “in 1988,” the sentence is essentially “in 1988, the debut ... was made … and returned … in 1990,” conveying that, in 1988, the debut returned in 1990. This issue could easily be missed by a test-taker who does not remember to consider the non-underlined portion along with the answer choice.
(B)
Correct. The active voice wording “Carlos Feller made his debut … and returned” effectively conveys a meaning that makes sense.
Also, using the pronoun “what,” rather than “who,” to refer to “his signature role, Don Alfonso” makes sense, as a role is a thing, not a person.
Answer: BTo make your thinking more sophisticated, carefully analyze verbal questions, even ones that you have seen previously, identifying the logic that makes the answers wrong or correct and clearly articulating that logic as if you have to explain what you have found to someone else.
Overall, it sounds as if you are on the right track. To confirm that you are and get more practice in handling the test itself, take some more practice tests as you go along.
Also, it would make sense to come back here to get some ideas on how to further refine what you are doing after you get your ESR and as you proceed.