Hi all,
I took my first real GMAT exam today and received a 660 score with (V41,Q39, IR 6), and it came as a real punch in the gut. For context, I took the my first practice GMAT (GMAC Practice test #1) cold approximately three weeks ago and received a 710 (V40,Q46), again, this was with zero studying. I subsequently took three more practice exams over the past few weeks, the results of which are listed below:
Practice exam #1 (Aug 25th) : 710 (V40,Q46, IR 7)
Practice exam #2 (Aug 28th): 700 (V45,Q40, IR 8)
Practice exam #3 (Sep 13th): 740 (V45, Q47, IR 8)
Practice exam #4: (Sep 15th): 770 (V51, Q47, IR 7)
As you can see my actual exam score was well below the +/- 30 range usually given for practice exams, as it was 70 points below my practice exam average, and a whooping 110 points lower than my last practice exam.
I spent the time between practice exams 2 and 3 working to shore up my quant (or so I thought) through TTP and the OG question bank. I also solved 100+ "Hard" CR/SC/RC OG Qs to maintain accuracy and got ~90% right.
I will add that I have tried to approximate test conditions as much as possible during my practice exams. I have only used the two "authorized" 8-minute breaks, did all sections in one siting (except AWA on exams 1&2) I have not used notes, a calculator, the pause button on hard questions etc. during any of my practice exams. Only difference between my practice exams and the real deal was that I took the practice exams at home at my desk and used paper instead of a whiteboard for my calcs. To be perfectly honest I didn't notice much of a difference between the whiteboard and the paper, so don't think that was much of a factor.
I took the exam in the following order (as I have done on all my practice exams):
1. Verbal
2. Quant
3. IRI
4. AWA
Couple of things I know threw me on the exam:
1. Because the interface is different on the real GMAT v. the practice tests (at least v. my laptop) I didn't see the last paragraph of a RC question until I was on Q3 of a 4Q question set relating to the paragraph (basically you had to scroll very carefully or you'd miss that paragraph and go back to the beginning on the passage). Not only did this quite probably cost me at least 1 (quite possibly 2) correct answers, but it also cost me A LOT of time, as the previous Qs that I think I missed didn't make a ton of sense without that paragraph. What's more this occurred in the early "teens" of the verbal section, leaving me short on time for the remainder of the section, to the point where I had to basically just guess on 2/3 of the last three questions, and spend considerably less time than I wanted to on the rest. I'd note that I usually have between 5-10 minutes remaining once I'm done with all verbal questions on my practice exams.
2. The quant score was much more surprising, in that I didn't "feel" as off whilst working through it, however, I definitely spent too much time on some Qs (double-checking answers I basically knew were right) to be "sure", leaving me short on time for other Qs, though I will say I didn't anticipate quite so poor a score (Q39), as that was lower than ANY of my practice test scores. Now having said that I know how much the GMAT tries to "trick" you in quant, and so I do wonder if in combination with my already shattered confidence from verbal (knowing already I'd missed that paragraph) plus the time crunch, I simply missed key details which led me to miss even "medium" questions, which I almost never miss in practice (90-95% accuracy on OG medium practice Qs).
3. At least in verbal, there were at least a couple of question types that I've never come across before. This makes me wonder how accurate the practice exams are, I've been reading different accounts both here and elsewhere suggesting the practice exams are old and unrepresentative of current materials, and this seemed true to a point.
In any event, it seems that looking at this objectively, I should have been able to have done much better and that poor time management, caused by stress of this being the "real thing" was the main culprit here. Does this sound like a reasonable analysis based on the information provided above (including practice test scores) that I have provided, or does it look more like wishcasting? Alternatively, are the practice exams just not representative of the real thing anymore, and so I read too much into my practice results?
I wanted to wrap with a question to the community, given my circumstances, do you believe it would make sense to schedule a retake exam in three weeks time (earliest date I can get)? Or are my practice exam scores just wholly unrepresentative, meaning I'll need more time? In sum, was my poor score due to stress causing poor time management or something else? And if it was stress, any strategies that you could suggest to help deal with it?
I will note that I cancelled my scores out of frustration, so there won't be an ESR. In retrospect, maybe I shouldn't have done that, but it is what it is.