MartyTargetTestPrep
Hi riddleme.
You missed mostly Grammar questions in SC. So, your performance on this test indicates that you need to get better at identifying grammar issues, such as subject-verb agreement, sentence structure, and pronoun issues.
You also ran out of time in Verbal, and throughout the section, you were getting medium questions correct but not getting higher difficulty questions correct. So, you need to on your Verbal skills in general.
One key aspect of effective Verbal prep is to shoot for very high practice accuracy. The reason this approach works is that, in shooting for very high accuracy, you really get your skills dialed in and learn to consistently see what's going on in Verbal questions and get them correct. Meanwhile, the same skills that support accuracy support speed. So, by working on achieving high accuracy, you get faster as well.
Suggested accuracies:
E - close to 100%
M - 90%+
H - 70%+
To achieve high accuracy, practice untimed at first and, any time you miss a question, figure out why (knowledge gap, skills gap, execution issue) and address the issue.
For more on how to prepare for GMAT Verbal effectively, see this post.
How to Score High on GMAT VerbalHi Marty,
Thanks for the analysis. If "Grammer" consists of SV, Sentence Structure, and Pronouns, what does "Communication" on SC consist of? I was better at it, still want to understand what exactly was good and continue building on the same. As for time management, I had an issue with my break after Quant. When I came back Verbal Timer had reduced by 4 mins, instead of raising the issue with test admins, I thought to let it go as timer was running still. Even with those 4mins things would have been still tight. Often experts tell about taking less time on SC so that you can make up more time for RC/CR. I am not looking for any exact split of time and make it unnecessarily complicated, but I wanted to know how to do SC quicker? I mean small questions are fine, but I did get a couple or more longer underlined SCs and they took up as much time as a standard CR would.
Do CR/RC stats look good? Is it possible that since I was at such lower score/difficulty level that my CR/RC stats look better, and I shouldn't focus too much of my time on SC.
I did a little more analysis of my ESR and this is the split of parts I came up with:
1: 6/8 correct (+1 experimental)
2: 6/7 correct (+2 experimental)
3: 5/7 correct (+2 experimental)
4: 4/8 correct (+1 experimental)
I know everyone says that don't buy into unproven conclusions like "First 10 questions' importance" but I feel like that did decide the fate of my test. I know I got 5 incorrect in that last 2 parts and they did bring my score down but if we see average difficulty graph, I attached below, my difficulty level kind of plateaued because of that starting 10 questions plateauing. I just got two wrong and the graph stayed there only. Even if theoretically I ever to answer only 2 more incorrect questions in last 2 parts, the score wouldn't have increased dramatically. (this is based on so many other ESRs I have seen on GMATClub) I don't see any graphs plateauing in first 2 parts and then increasing dramatically even if test-taker nearly all answers correctly in last 2 parts. With that said, I feel like making 2-3 mistakes in first 2 parts is heavily penalized and you don't get more chances to increase the score. I know it's wrong to say from my perspective as I clearly answered so much wrong in last 2 parts. All in all, if I ever to target elite V40 or more, theoretically speaking, I can make only one mistake at max (leaving experimental questions) in the first 2 parts. And that's why the verbal is starting to feel an uphill battle. 14/15 correct in one go, that's the target.
Attachments

Screenshot 2023-07-13 191754.png [ 83.17 KiB | Viewed 940 times ]