Hi All,
I'm Kalash, a computer science graduate who recently scored 685 on the GMAT (V85, Q88, D79). My journey wasn't straightforward - it involved recognising my limitations early, embracing structured preparation, and learning some hard truths about test-taking. Here's my detailed debrief that I hope will help others on their GMAT journey.
Why Self-Study Wasn't EnoughI walked into GMAT prep thinking I could tackle it on my own. But one month into the prep, I realised that the prep was not going anywhere. I needed a structure that would ensure that I am taking the right steps toward my target.
After dabbling with free resources online, I quickly realised that the GMAT wasn't testing what I thought it was testing. It wasn't about knowing Math or English - it was about thinking in a very specific way under time pressure.
That's when I decided to invest in e-GMAT, influenced by its affordability and recommendations from colleagues who had succeeded with it.
Verbal: From Intuition to Method (V85)Despite my confidence in English, CR became my biggest initial challenge. The verbal section requires you to think in ways that aren't intuitive at first. I was consistently stuck at 55% accuracy for hard questions, with wild variations in my performance.
The game-changer was learning to approach CR systematically through pre-thinking. Instead of diving into answer choices, I started analysing what the question was really asking and anticipating the answer type. This wasn't easy initially - it felt unnatural and time-consuming. But with consistent practice through e-GMAT’s Scholaranium's custom quizzes, it became second nature.
What made Scholaranium particularly valuable was its flexibility. I could create quizzes specifically targeting my weak areas - incorrect questions, unanswered questions, specific question types like Boldface or Inference. My
error log analysis revealed patterns I couldn't see otherwise. Through focused practice on medium and hard GMAT-style questions, my CR accuracy for questions jumped from 55% to 80%, and my timing improved dramatically, while the time came down to under 2 minutes.
For Reading Comprehension, I leveraged the same systematic approach, focusing on passage structure and main ideas rather than getting lost in details. The improvement was reflected not just in accuracy but in confidence - I was no longer second-guessing myself on every question.
Quant: The Behavioural Challenge (Q88)Here's where my engineering background both helped and hurt. The concepts weren't the issue - I could solve most problems. The real challenge? Behavioral issues that I initially dismissed as "silly mistakes."
I discovered this painful truth through sectional mocks. There's no worse feeling than knowing you could have scored Q89 but getting Q82 or Q83 because you solved correctly but marked the wrong answer, or misread what the question was asking for. As I told Rashmi, my mentor, this was "a very sore topic for me."
The solution came through two key tools:
First, sectional mocks provided reality checks. They showed me it wasn't just about solving questions but about maintaining pace and accuracy over 23 questions. These mocks taught me to trust my answers and move forward confidently rather than second-guessing.
Second, NEURON (e-GMAT's platform for official questions) became a game-changer in the second half of my prep. I went and solved a bunch of questions on NEURON, to fix the behavioural errors that I had identified. The platform's detailed explanations helped me identify consistent patterns in my mistakes. Was I making calculation errors? Misreading questions? Choosing wrong answer choices despite solving correctly? The pattern recognition was invaluable.
The turning point was accepting that at my level, it wasn't about learning new concepts but about execution. I developed personal strategies like taking an extra second to verify I was marking the correct option and ensuring I understood exactly what each question asked before solving.
This brought stability in my score, and I started doing well on the sectional mocks.Data Insights: Managing Test Day Pressure
Getting into the test, I had DI sorted. Despite initial hiccups due to behavioural issues again, going into the test, I was doing well in DI on my mocks. I had even scored a DI87 on my latest mock.
However, test day nerves hit me the hardest here.
After strong performances in Verbal and Quant, the first two DI questions threw me off. The "impending feeling of it's going so well, I don't want to deter my score here" made me overly cautious.
What I learned: perceived difficulty is often just that - perceived. Looking back, I could have solved those questions, but letting doubt creep in affected my performance. The burnout from sitting for over an hour also played a role. Taking deep breaths and maintaining composure helped me salvage a D79 rather than dropping to the low 70s.
The Last Mile Push Program:
I cannot overstate the value of personalised mentorship through e-GMAT's Last Mile Push program. Over three months, my mentor Rashmi and I exchanged 150-160 emails. This wasn't just about getting study plans - it was about having someone who could see patterns I couldn't, push me when I needed pushing, and redirect me when I was wasting effort.
Initially, I made the mistake of thinking I needed to complete everything in the course. Rashmi helped me understand that with my starting point around 70th percentile, I needed targeted improvement, not comprehensive coverage. When CR became frustrating, we adaptively switched to Quant, promising to return to Verbal later - a decision that maintained my momentum.
The mentorship taught me to be proactive. Instead of waiting for instructions, I learned to anticipate what data my mentor would need, complete sectional mocks pre-emptively, and be "brutally honest" about my struggles.
Mock Test Journey: Learning from Variation
My mock scores showed significant variation initially, which taught me that consistency was as important as peak performance. The progression of my sectional mocks from volatile scores to stable, high performance was a direct result of addressing behavioral issues and building test-taking stamina.
I cannot stress enough: analysing mocks is as important as taking them. Understanding not just what you got wrong but why - conceptual gap, process error, or behavioural issue - is crucial for improvement.
The test day went well, except for the DI panic that I faced!
Key Takeaways- Structure beats self-study: Even if you're strong in the subjects, GMAT requires specific thinking patterns that structured courses teach effectively.
- Quality over quantity: Focus on understanding patterns in your mistakes rather than solving endless questions.
- Behavioural issues are real: At higher scores, execution matters more than knowledge. Develop systems to avoid careless errors.
- Mentorship accelerates progress: Having an experienced guide prevents wasted effort and provides crucial perspective.
- Stress is the score killer: As my mentor told me, "Enjoy the paper." It sounds counterintuitive, but staying relaxed and confident is crucial. I was literally smiling during Quant!
- Trust the process: When you've prepared well, trust your instincts during the test. Second-guessing kills time and accuracy.
Final Thoughts
The GMAT humbles you. I came in thinking my strengths were Quant and English; Verbal became my biggest challenge before becoming my biggest success. The test isn't about what you know - it's about how you think and execute under pressure.
To anyone struggling with similar challenges, remember that a 685 isn't built on perfection but on recognising weaknesses, adapting strategies, and executing consistently. The journey from 70th percentile to 685 wasn't just about learning content - it was about learning myself as a test-taker.
Feel free to ask questions about any aspect of my journey. I'm here to help, just as this community helped me.
Good luck to all future test-takers!
Best regards,
Kalash