1. Background & challenges
- I started GMAT prep at least 3 years ago, but always tried to manage it alongside a full-time, extremely hectic work schedule.
- I have significant family obligations that require my physical presence, plus weeks (especially June to September) when I can’t even spare Sundays.
- Academically, I don’t come from an engineering background, so quantitative fundamentals weren’t strong.
2. Early prep & failures
- My first class was with a local coach using the old‐edition GMAT. The focus was mostly “sums / drills,” which felt disconnected from real GMAT style.
- Quant was “okay-ish,” but Verbal was terrible — especially sentence correction, critical reasoning, etc.
- Because of work and family pressures, I procrastinated a lot. At one point, I gave a free mock, got demoralized, and realized I lacked confidence and clarity on how to progress.
- By then, GMAT (Focus / new edition) had shifted, which meant previous prep was less relevant.
Then, I joined another local class. This time, Verbal improved somewhat, but Quant became weak again. The class style was still too mechanical and lacked depth for problem-solving surprises. Meanwhile, I practiced questions on GMAT Club in a scattered, unplanned way — not following a structured roadmap.
3. Turning point / pivot
- I started watching quant videos on YouTube and found an outstanding quant professor. I reached out to him, and he recommended Target Test Prep (TTP) for quant as a complete, rigorous system. He said “you won’t need anything else.”
- Although TTP was expensive and intensive, I decided to commit fully — it turned out to be the best decision of my GMAT journey.
4. Deep dive with TTP & structured study
- TTP is very extensive. It is not something you can begin 1–2 months before your test and expect full coverage; ideally, you should begin 5–6+ months out so you can go deep.
- I used it topic by topic: theory, example walkthroughs, and then sets of easy / medium / hard practice for each topic.
- During the TTP phase, I didn’t divide my attention too much — I mostly stayed focused on TTP plus selective mock exams.
- As soon as I was comfortable with portions, I began taking mocks from Experts’ Global and GMAT Official. In total, I took ~15 Experts’ Global mocks and 6 Official mocks ×2 (i.e. 12 official mock attempts), reserving 5–6 mocks for the final stretch.
- After finishing the TTP curriculum, I transitioned to practicing GMAT Club “difficult” questions, but I also followed advice from peers: don’t only do 700+ level problems. The sweet spot was practicing many 655-level problems, solidifying consistency before pushing difficulty higher.
5. Disruptions & setbacks
- During prep, there were periods when family health issues demanded time and mental bandwidth, which disrupted consistency.
- In some phases, I couldn’t maintain my ideal mock schedule or study intensity.
- These interruptions likely prevented me from achieving my “peak” potential on the first attempt.
6. Attempts, test day, result
- I made a couple of attempts (the score gap was 30 points in the first and last).
- On my final attempt, I brought all my learnings together.
- My final score: 675 (Quant / Verbal breakdown as per your result).
- Though not perfect, this result reflected steady growth, resilience, and incremental gains.
7. What worked vs what didn’t & advice
What worked / strengths:- TTP’s structured, topic-wise approach helped me build solid fundamentals and cover “corner cases.”
- Using mocks from both official and third-party sources forced me to adapt to variability.
- Gradually transitioning from easier to tougher questions (rather than diving into only hardest ones) helped avoid burnout and cement consistency.
- Staying persistent despite life’s disruptions.
What didn’t work / mistakes:- Starting too early in fragmented way without a clear plan led to slow progress.
- Doing random GMAT Club problems without integration (i.e. without linking back to weaknesses) was low yield.
- Underestimating the time needed for full coverage of TTP.
- Not treating mocks early on as checkpoints — sometimes I delayed mocks due to fear of low score.
- The disruptions in consistency (due to life events) hurt performance.
Advice for those in similar shoes (job + family constraints + non-quant background):- Plan a long runway — aim for 5–6+ (minimum) months of structured prep if possible.
- Choose a strong, structured system (like TTP) early, and use it as your backbone.
- Allocate mocks early and often to calibrate.
- Resist the temptation to “jump into hardest problems” too soon — build consistency first.
- During disruption periods, maintain at least minimal touch (e.g. 30 minutes review) to avoid backsliding.
- Use forums like GMAT Club to align your arrangement of problem difficulty, share challenges, and maintain accountability.
8. Closing thoughts & encouragement
This journey was far from smooth. I had multiple setbacks, doubts, and plateaus. But reaching 675 (from Verbal being my weak spot and life constraints) taught me that steady, consistent effort + the right framework can move mountains.
If you’re juggling work, family, or not a quant kid, know this: your path may be longer, but you can reach your target. I’m happy to answer any questions, share my study logs, or help anyone in a similar spot.
Best of luck to all - persistence + structure is your secret weapon.