I started my GMAT prep in January and used TTP’s flexible course structure throughout. I knew I didn’t need to go through every single lesson, so I customized my prep — giving the test three times between February and July. For me, TTP worked best as a self-driven resource. Along the way, I realized that some of my assumptions about having “strong concepts” weren’t entirely true, and the material helped me go back, fill those gaps, and rebuild my foundation.
I combined TTP with the Official Guide, and that pairing worked extremely well. I also made a conscious choice not to over-index on very hard test prep sets — I didn’t want to burn out or set unrealistic expectations. Instead, I focused on understanding patterns, revisiting mistakes, and using community forums to refine my strategies. In the end, I’m sure there was some luck involved too, but overall, the OG + TTP combination was incredibly effective. It helped me stay structured yet flexible — and genuinely set me up well for the actual exam.
In terms of strengths, I think the product is exceptionally well-designed and thoughtfully structured. It strikes the perfect balance between depth and breadth without adding unnecessary complexity or concepts that won’t appear on the actual test. It challenges you just the right amount and offers great flexibility — you can revisit questions, design your own practice modules, and simulate realistic test scenarios. That combination of balance and adaptability is what I appreciated most.
If there’s one area for improvement, it would be the difficulty balance — some of the easy questions felt a bit too simple. They do a good job of setting the foundation, but I’d have loved to see a few more medium and hard questions to make the overall experience more challenging and realistic.
Overall, if you’re preparing for the GMAT on your own, I don’t think there’s a better resource out there. It’s comprehensive, thoughtfully structured, and helps you build confidence step by step — without overwhelming you.